Talk:Battle of Byram's Ford/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 10:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Nice work on this one. A few comments:
- Something weird going on with the lead being below the TOC...
- Fixed
- Could you put an image in the infobox?
- Done. I'd like to use File:Battle of the Blue by Benjamin D. Mileham.jpg, but I can't unfortunately because it may not be proveably PD
- suggest reducing the {{TOC limit}} to 3
- Done (I think)
- Lead
- say what state it happened in in the first sentence
- Done
- link Union forces to Union Army
- Done
- Part of Price's for
dce- Done, as well as fixing a tense switch later in the same sentence
- "of Brigadier General Joseph O. Shelby
's"- Done
- "above the Union defenses
at Byram's Ford"- Done
- "Pleasonton broke through Marmaduke's position
at Potato Hill"- Done
- Body
- suggest "The invasion was designed to start"→"It was hoped that the invasion would start"
- Done
- link infantry for infantrymen
- I've already linked infantry in the last paragraph of the previous section; I'm not sure that the duplink would be necessary here
- I would reorganise the explanation of the Confederate divisions in the order the commanders are named
- Done
- link militia
- Done
- active military
movementoperations- Done
- "Sanborn commanded the
unitformation"- Done
- who was William Fishback?
- Glossed (a militia officer)
- "would not permit the Kansas State Militia
from movingto move further east"- Done
- "Confederate troops attacked the rear guard"
- Done
- "a feint attack on the northern part"
- Done
- "while forcing his way across the river"
- Done
More to come. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- "Union skirmishers back across the Big Blue" the 2nd Colorado Cavalry?
- Source doesn't identify the troops
- "the 2nd Colorado Cavalry reported"
- Done
- suggest "two units from his brigade – Nichols's Missouri Cavalry Regiment and Schnable's Missouri Cavalry Battalion – to reinforce Thompson."
- Done
- "Colonel B. Frank Gordon and
thehis 5th Missouri Cavalry Regiment"- Done
- did the ford where Gordon crossed have a name? Was his crossing opposed at all?
- Neither Lause, Collins, Sinisi, Kirkman, or Monnett name the ford, so probably not. Added that the crossing occurred without incident.
- "prevented from moving north by the Confederates" Slayback's battalion?
- Source doesn't explicitly say this, referring to the Confederates who had poured through Hinkle's Ford
- "but Moonlight
failed todid not get the order" it is hardly a failure of Moonlight if he didn't get a message- Reworded, as possibly causing an indication of failure on Moonlight's part. "Failed to get/receive the order" is acceptable AmEng for when someone doesn't receive something even with no fault, though
- "but
wasarrived at Hinkle's Ford"- Done
- "so he sent Jackman's brigade to the south"?
- Done
- "way to Westport
,; and Shelby" as there is internal punctuation within the latter two parts of the sentence- Done
More to come. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- the header should read "October 23: Pleasonton crosses the river"
- Corrected
- "further to the west on a height known as Potato Hill" should say approx how far from the river, as it later becomes clear that it is only a short distance
- Done
- comma after "Battery H, 2nd Missouri Light Artillery Regiment"
- Added
- "Jackman withdrew
from beforein the face of Sanborn's brigade."- Done
- comma after "Battery L, 2nd Missouri Light Artillery Regiment"
- Added
- "Lause estima
gtes"- Corrected
- Note c. "Potato Hill was renamed
toBloody Hill after the battle"- Done
The images are appropriately licensed. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Nice job thus far. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:03, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Peacemaker67: - Replied to all points made so far. I'm hoping to run this one through ACR and maybe eventually FAC. Hog Farm Talk 03:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by a maps and photographs with acceptable licensing and appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Peacemaker67: - Replied to all points made so far. I'm hoping to run this one through ACR and maybe eventually FAC. Hog Farm Talk 03:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)