Talk:Batman in film/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GAR request from April. Some referencing issues. Looks like the original Good Article has been heavily expanded. It needs some better organisation too. A lot of the recent additions mention cameos and would be better off in a combined section than having one or two sentence headings. AIRcorn (talk) 21:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ImmortalWizard: as GAR requester. AIRcorn (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aircorn: I've gone through and tried to address some of the issues that you raised. Cheers! Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 19:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will have another look through soon. AIRcorn (talk) 08:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aircorn: Any update on this? Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 17:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Will have a look now. AIRcorn (talk) 08:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see an expand section tag at the Justice League (2017). It is written like the film has not been released yet so needs an update (which will probably solve the expand section tag). AIRcorn (talk) 08:08, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Reception section just consists of lists. This should have some prose. I know we cover the reception for individual movies at their heading, but it could be a good place to look at the series as a whole. A paragraph will probably be enough. We have the gross amounts in the lead, but not in the body. This could be mentioned here. AIRcorn (talk) 08:20, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) seems a bit plot heavy for this overview article. AIRcorn (talk) 08:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All in all good work so far. It will probably pay to keep an eye on the "The Batman (2021)" section. I imagine it will become its own article soon, but since it redirects here there is a danger of it becoming a bit undue. It is fine at the moment. If you look into the three points above and see if you can improve them and then give me a ping I will look to close this (unless someone else raises some valid issues). AIRcorn (talk) 08:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Etzedek24: You still interested in this? AIRcorn (talk) 09:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aircorn: Yeah, I was waiting to see if someone more familiar would step up. But I'll do my best to fix these issues in the next couple days. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 18:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. AIRcorn (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aircorn: Let me know what you think of the changes. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 04:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I feel it meets the criteria now. AIRcorn (talk) 06:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]