Jump to content

Talk:Bantz J. Craddock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Craddock is currently working for Engility Corporation as the Senior Vice President, Strategic Relations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.154.200 (talk) 21:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Article is from a .mil site, which is a US military site, which means it is a US government site, which means it is public domain material. Please restore the article.--Looper5920 09:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That may be, but it seems like a strech to say that everything with a .mil (or .gov) source is public domain. Do you have a source for either a Wikipedia or a military policy to that effect? --Art Carlson 09:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you attempt to load a photo onto Wikipedia there is a blanket PD copyright for "This is a work of a US Gov't agency". Everything put on the web by the US gov't is public domain. Tha same cannot be said for state or local govt's.--Looper5920 09:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. With the "work of the US Gov" tag I'm happy now. --Art Carlson 07:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article name - move?

[edit]

He sames to use his middlename of John, rather than Bantz. The NATO biog of him as SACEUR refers to him as John Craddock, this British newspaper article, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/21/afghanistan-nato is the same. To me this suggest that this article should be at John Craddock (US Army officer), or possibly B. John Craddock, the current title doesn't seem to have any real justification. David Underdown (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul O Grady

[edit]

I think he looks exactly like Paul O'Grady. Probably not worth a mention, just thought I would bring it up. --Spongefrog (talk) 20:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bantz J. Craddock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bantz J. Craddock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]