Talk:BD-J
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unlisted is the Chronicles of Narnia BD-J (Game for sure... Enhanced menu, possibly?), but I've never learned how to edit these pages. I'll leave it up to you guys. 76.229.155.27 (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Modified the statement:
"All GEM-based standards are built on top of Java Micro Edition ("Java ME") technology, invented by Sun Microsystems and maintained and enhanced by the Java Community Process."
because it is untrue. OCAP 1.0 and MHP 1.0.3 are both GEM-based and reference PersonalJava/Java 1.1.8 rather than an ME platform.
Citation needed
This article reads like a promo with no references to where the information was obtained --Zurtex 15:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Toying around?
[edit]So, is it possible to write little java programs that run on a DVD-player? Like, a little java game or something like that? 84.59.124.244 (talk) 18:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Insufficiently standardized
[edit]I read in c't (German version) that bd-j is insufficiently standardized and that programmers never know in advance before testing on many player models whether a Java application works on all models. So all new movies first have to be tested on many different player models which is of course tedious and costly.
Moreover some players do not have the resources to execute extensive Java codes, resulting in long load times or worse. Using bd-j had been discouraged, because of these problems, so that is why there so much few bd-j enhanced movies when compared to HD DVD.
The only bright side of the story is that all works fine on the PS3 and that bd-j offers many possibilities. Andries (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on BD-J. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080530103102/http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=117&start=0 to http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=117&start=0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009115330/http://www.bdjforum.com/ to http://www.bdjforum.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060421101018/http://www.mhp.org/ to http://www.mhp.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)