Jump to content

Talk:Australian rules football in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Query

[edit]

"The sport has grown to over 2,000 participants, over 60% of which are American.[citation needed]" IS there a citation for this?Rich Farmbrough 21:09 10 April 2006 (UTC).

Sources are needed

[edit]

There are so many assertions in this article that require verification and sources (aside from the www.worldfooty.com website which appears to be the sole source for almost all these 'International AFL' articles). Also, it needs a more neutral and less parochial tone; as it stands a reader would get a rather skewed perception of the game's significance in the United States.CumberlandsAshes81 03:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm at it there is also a bewildering number of articles on this topic - all of which have basically no third party sources there are also articles for a large number of amateur teams which have questionable notability.CumberlandsAshes81
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australian rules football in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australian rules football in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]