Talk:Art of the Upper Paleolithic
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Lascaux-aurochs.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Lascaux-aurochs.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011
|
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
Link required
[edit]"Africa "The earliest undisputed African rock art dates back about 10,000 years, apparently originating in the Nile Valley and spread as far west as Mali." Apparent to whom? What is the source? Is the direction of the spread certain? 83.84.100.133 (talk) 17:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
"controversially dated", "contentious dates"
[edit]We should not be interested in the earliest possible dates ever suggested. This is selection bias. We might as well focus on the latest possible dates ever suggested and report these as "contentious", and the article would look completely different. What we need to report first and foremost is the mainstream estimate. After that, it is still possible to quote minority opinions. --dab (𒁳) 11:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Also, we can easily do an article on prehistoric African rock art, but this article should focus on the Paleolithic proper. Early rock art found in Algeria, Tanzania etc. dated to about 5000 years ago distracts from the main topic, especially if it is wedged between Paleolithic examples without making clear the difference in age. Cut from the article:
Noted sites containing early art, dated to about 5,200 years ago, include Tassili n'Ajjer in southern Algeria, Tadrart Acacus in Libya (A Unesco World Heritage site), and the Tibesti Mountains in northern Chad.[1]
The rock paintings at the Wonderwerk Cave in South Africa are probably more recent than 1,000 years ago, but small engraved stones were found within the deposit, mainly from the Later Stone Age sequence where they date back some 10,500 years.
Rock art in Tanzania apparently dates to 3,500 BP and later.[1]
Most of East African rock art is found on a plateau between the Zambezi River and the Great Rift Valley. Running from southern Kenya and Uganda in the north, through Tanzania to Zambia and Malawi in the south, the rock art in this area is mostly paintings, although some engravings are found. Most of the painting is of figures of animals and people, with some geometric shapes. Red paintings in Tanzania have been extensively studied, by the Leakeys (Mary and Louis) among others. [2]
White paintings in Zambia appear to date from about 2,000 years ago, with the arrival of Bantu speakers in the area, an observation confirmed by oral history of modern tribes in the area.
--dab (𒁳) 12:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Art of the Upper Paleolithic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120053950/http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/pferd.php to http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/pferd.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120053855/http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/bison.php to http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/bison.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120054549/http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/mammut.php to http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/mammut.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120054545/http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/loewenkopf.php to http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/loewenkopf.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121124012/http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/leopard.php to http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/leopard.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121124048/http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/nashorn.php to http://www.ice-age-art.de/anfaenge_der_kunst/vogelherd/nashorn.php
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-sci-venus14-2009may14%2C0%2C181830.story
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Art of the Upper Paleolithic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425064551/http://capra.group.shef.ac.uk/5/pettitt.pdf to http://capra.group.shef.ac.uk/5/pettitt.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
oldest hand stencils, sulawesi
[edit]The earliest dated image from Maros, with a minimum age of 39.9 kyr, is now the oldest known hand stencil in the world. In addition, a painting of a babirusa (‘pig -deer’) made at least 35.4 kyr ago is among the earliest dated figurative depictions worldwide, if not the earliest one.
from: Pleistocene cave art from Sulawesi, Indonesia, M. Aubert, A. Brumm, M. Ramli, T. Sutikna, E. W. Saptomo, B. Hakim, M. J. Morwood, G. D. van den Bergh, L. Kinsley & A. Dosseto, Nature volume 514, pages 223–227 Mr. bobby (talk) 20:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
You want to be careful to state "world's oldest known" instead of "world's oldest", as there can always be new discoveries. In this case, at "39.9 ka" (cite the confidence interval!!), they are of the same age (overlapping confidence intervals) as the oldest known hand stencils from the Caves of Monte Castillo, and formerly were certainly among the world's oldest known hand stencils. However, if you would deign to read the article, there is a 2018 study which has dated a hand stencil from Maltravieso (Extremadura) at c. 64 ka, so that the ones dated c. 40 ka now no longer qualify as "oldest known" even if they previously have done so. --dab (𒁳) 13:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- I was mistaken, the oldest hand stencil from EL Castillo is 37 ka, somewhat younger than the Sulawesi one; the oldest "art" from El Castillo, a red stippled disk, is 40 ka, i.e. overlapping intervals with the Sulawesi stencil. This doesn't affect the point that the oldest known hand stencil is now the one dated 64 ka from Extremadura.
- The interesting point here isn't the difference between the numbers 37, 39.9 or 40, but the fact that very similar traditions are found in karstic caves in Iberia and in Sulawesi at virtually the same time. This strongly suggests to me that the tradition was inherited, and must have existed at least 50 ka, at the divergence of West Eurasians and Australoids. --dab (𒁳) 06:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class Africa articles
- Low-importance Africa articles
- Start-Class Mali articles
- Low-importance Mali articles
- WikiProject Mali articles
- Start-Class Namibia articles
- Low-importance Namibia articles
- WikiProject Namibia articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- Start-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles
- Start-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles