Talk:Ars grammatica

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Well, if "Ars grammatica" means "Art of grammar" ...

Merging with Art of Grammar

Why?

The Art of Grammar article refers to a completely different work of Greek grammar, there does not seem to be any logic in merging these two articles. 192.75.118.47 16:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I am removing the Merge marker (if I can, I am not an admin.) --Kenmayer (talk) 13:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation?

On the other hand, would it make sense to have a Dab Hatnote as the first line of the accompanying article? To wit:

--Jerzy•t 06:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(That question arose from our realization, in working on Art of Grammar, that this (Wikimedia Foundation-hosted) Koine text of that work has "Ars Grammatica" on its cover page.)
--Jerzy•t 06:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ars grammatica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002005432/http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/1032.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/1032.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]