Talk:Apple Music 100 Best Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/05/apple-music-celebrates-the-launch-of-inaugural-100-best-albums-list/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genre distribution

There are no dance albums so there is no reason to count 1 album as part of the list, if you want to make a distribution like this, please explain how each of the albums is related to certain genre, if not, it would be better to leave it as http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Rolling_Stone%27s_500_Greatest_Albums_of_All_Time with no Genre distribution. Also, Bad Bunny counts a Reggaeton a sub latin genre, not latin.

Full List

Is there a reason that there isn't a full list of the albums in order on this page? Everywhere else on the internet seems to only have the listing in groups of ten, I assumed Wikipedia would have the full list, but if there's an actual reason to exclude that here I won't add one. If there's no reason, I will. TheNeutroniumAlchemist (talk) 01:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Representing list as table

Would it be better and more legible to represent the list as a table with columns for artist, album name, genre, date released etc?

Some other list articles related to music are in table form however they are not editorial rankings e.g. List of best-selling music artists, List of best-selling albums. SirCake (talk) 13:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another point in favor of table: List of Rolling Stone Brasil 100 Greatest Brazilian Music Records BanjoZebra (talk) 20:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protect this article?

It's been getting a lot of vandalism, especially people changing the #1 album in the list. Could be worth protecting for a little while. BanjoZebra (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Receptions

The material in this section in no way supports "mixed" reviews, which I changed to "scathing." Everything cited is very bad to withering, with one exception on #1. Agreeing with 1 item on this list can in no way be construed as a good review. (Particularly if it's from of the above critics who trashed it.) Caroljean2 (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]