Talk:Antoine de Pluvinel

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Horse training task force.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Born in 1552 or 1555

I read the Japanese translation version of Étienne SAUREL's HISTOIRE L'ÉQUITATION, 1971. Saurel noted Pluvinel was born in 1555. --Kurihaya (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this known discrepancy is now adequately covered on the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shoulder-in

I believe that the shoulder in was not "officially" invented until de la Gueriniere did so, his book in 1732 (ish) describes it. Whilst it is clearly visible in Newcastle's work of a hundred years before this, it was neither named nor really acknowledged there.

MarkRSUK (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any sort of source for that, Mark? The article is almost without references at the moment. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think either Wynmalen or Podhajsky may have discussed this issue in one of their books, unfortunately, I cannot remember which one (may also have been Muesler). Point is, there is probably an expert source that discusses the issue. There is also the whole debate over whether the movement is correctly performed on 3 or 4 tracks, but that's yet another issue. Montanabw^(talk) 02:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]