Jump to content

Talk:Anne Tyler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

How does Anne Tyler writing relate to literature —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.93.138 (talk) 20:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Source

[edit]

If someone is interested in expanding this article, this source may be helpful. http://www.vqronline.org/articles/1992/summer/willrich-watching-windows/ --Mmdoogie (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Anne Tyler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anne Tyler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tone issues?

[edit]

Hi everyone, when I was reading through this article I came across just a general vibe that didn't feel super encyclopedic or on-brand for how I'm used to Wikipedia articles sounding. I can't quite put my finger on it, so I wanted to get a bit of a read on how other editors felt about it before I made any edits. Here are some examples of the casual (almost essay-ish?) tone that I was picking up on:

"Living in New York City was quite an adjustment for her. There she became somewhat addicted to riding trains and subways:"

"Baltimore is generally considered to have a true mix of Southern and Northern culture."

"The magic of her novels starts with her ability to create those characters in the reader's mind through the use of remarkably realistic details."

"Tyler is not without her critics."

I would also argue for the necessity of having an entire section devoted to "Work Habits", it just feels overly personal and a little extraneous to devote ink to what room she works in, what hours of the day, etcetera.

I feel that the kind of writing that I'm trying to point out doesn't hold up to Wikipedia best practice, but I'm not sure how to diagnose it, and I see that this page was evaluated as B-class so maybe it's not as messy as it seems to my eyes. Do any other editors see these as issues in the article? If so, I would be happy to move forward with making some serious edits to the page.

PalmyranRealness (talk) 01:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an editor but I 100% agree with you on the tone of the article. It's obvious that most of this page was written by a well-meaning but very biased Anne Tyler superfan. I think some major editing is very much needed. NicolasJz (talk) 12:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]