Talk:Alnus parvifolia
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Alnus parvifolia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that despite being known since 1926, Alnus parvifolia wasn't named such until 1987? Source: Wolfe and Wehr 1987
- ALT1: ... that damage patterns on fossil Alnus parvifolia leaves were initially misidentified as flea beetle eggs? Source: Labandeira, C. C. (2002) and Lewis & Carroll (1991)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Munida gregaria
Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC).
- Interesting article that was moved to mainspace the same day it was nominated. Long enough and all sources look good. Both hooks are short and cited with sources I could check online, ALT1 is a bit more interesting. The article text says the renaming happened in 1988, rather than 1987, like the hook and source say - this seems to be an error. The latter part of the first paragraph in the description section needs a citation. It would be good to point to specific pages in the references, although this is not necessary (I eventually found the relevant part in Labandeira 2002 on p. 51). Otherwise everything looks good and ready to go. QPQ is done. The image is a free photo taken by the nominator. Ffranc (talk) 13:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ffranc 1988 was indeed a typo, and I have corrected it to 1987 as it should have been, and I have added an additional citation to the description section as asked.--Kevmin § 18:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Excellent! Ffranc (talk) 08:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
History and classification
[edit]"Berry grouped the Chu Chua betulceous leaves ... " Should that be "betulaceous"? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 02:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- C-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- C-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- C-Class Eastern Washington task force articles
- Unknown-importance Eastern Washington task force articles
- Eastern Washington task force articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject Canada's 10,000 Challenge
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Wikipedia Did you know articles