Talk:All This and World War II

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Film: Documentary / War / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

The Beatles Low‑importance

This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

For this article

Add release date for Rod Stewart single, "Get Back". (At the moment, there is just the year.)
Add chart position for Rod Stewart single, "Get Back".
Add chart position for the The Four Seasons European single "We Can Work It Out".
Add a Critical reception sub-section to the Soundtrack album section. The album received excellent reviews at the time of its release.
Try to track down a rumour that the music artists were paid a percentage of the film gross (which was nothing), and not a percentage of the soundtrack album gross (which made money).

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

Fascinating but pointless?

"is a fascinating but pointless musical documentary"? Whoa. I'll try to de-POV it, if possible, though I just came to c/e. Tamarkot 02:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article still has a bad POV flavor to it, but seems to actually have a couple of sources cited. I'd strongly recommend anyone familiar with the subject material try to give this a cleanup (and perhaps rewrite). Remember: this should read like an encyclopedia entry -- not a movie review from a film critic or a personal opinion from a 'blog entry. 66.17.118.207 13:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can remember watching this on TV in the early 1980s - some what garblingly my memory had it as 'World War II and all that' but the list of songs used matches. I hadn't realised the songs were covered. I wonder though if this was a later edition as the last song which accompanied footage of the atomic bombings sounded as if sung by Blondie. Each to their own but I thought the mix of newsreel, movie clip and song made for an interesting presentation.Cloptonson (talk) 07:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stub to Start class

To bring this article to start class, a cast section and infobox should be added, and then the stub can be switched to start. --Nehrams2020 04:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. HairyWombat 23:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How can a documentary style film, using period footage, have a cast? Gwladys24 (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. However, the section adds useful information so should be retained. What is needed is an alternative to "Cast". Can't think of one off-hand; "featuring", "presenting", and "starring" don't really work as sub-headings. 74.205.216.180 (talk) 16:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, the information could be retained as part of a larger section that gives a better explanation of the nature of the film. Some more description would provide context for the current list & might allow for that list to be broken up & the details included more appropriately. Gwladys24 (talk) 14:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POV

"The Beatles' significance was pushed to the breaking point"? What the hell does that mean? Jack Meihoffer 00:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See #Why The Beatles? below. HairyWombat 04:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the article no longer uses any Stub template, I have promoted it to Start class. (It was already Start class on WikiProject The Beatles, and now it is Start class on all three.) HairyWombat 05:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why The Beatles?

One thing the article doesn't touch is the decision to use songs by The Beatles in a documentary about the Second World War. I can understand the concept behind Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?, but why The Beatles, for heaven's sake? Irony? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Money. The point of the film was not the film, but the soundtrack album. An album of Beatles' covers would make more money. (I have the album; it is excellent.) HairyWombat 04:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack - Personnel

The Soundtrack Personnel section doesn't really make much sense. There are obviously many artists on the soundtrack who are not listed under personnel. Does that then mean that the personnel section just features artists who were contracted to work on the whole album, house band style, & other artists added their contributions on top? Unfortunately there's no explanation given. If all that's available is information regarding who performed on each song, perhaps that's best listed on a song by song basis. Gwladys24 (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was around when the album was released, and remember radio interviews with some of the artists. In the interviews, they explained how they were each sent a backing track to which they added vocals. The backing tracks are also uniform, sounding like they were produced by the same group of people. So, while the personnel section needs to be improved, it does make sense to have one. 74.205.216.180 (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That makes some sense. For example, Getting Better is credited to Status Quo but only features Francis Rossi on vocals, as far as I know. However it's presented, it's not quite right at the moment.Gwladys24 (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on All This and World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110821150330/http://www.revengeismydestiny.com/cult_movies_war_is_hell.html to http://www.revengeismydestiny.com/cult_movies_war_is_hell.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Film Director?

How come the article in itself states that Tony Palmer directed this film, but states in the infobox, that Susan Winslow is the director?

This is pretty confusing. Who really directed this film? Tony Palmer or Susan Winslow? Even the film's IMDB page states that Susan Winslow directed this film. The IMDB's trivia page even states this:

"The film's director Susan Winslow was hired as she had been a researcher on the movie Brother, Can You Spare A Dime? (1975) which integrated Warner Brothers film footage and 1930s newsreels with gramophone songs of that era. Her original role was as a researcher and to select footage but her contribution became so important she was named the film's director."

Any answers are really appreciated. Thanks very much in advance.Frschoonover (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable link?

The film in it's entirety on YouTube Espngeek (talk) 02:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be cross-referenced with the Wikipedia page for the movie All This And Heaven Too

The article should be cross-referenced with the Wikipedia page for the Hollywood movie All This And Heaven Too - which the title surely alluded to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.210.174 (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]