This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alexander Mountain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Alexander Mountain is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
discussion of sources attributing the fire to human causes
inclusion of any mid or long term evaluation of efficacy
inclusion of any policy responses
more free-to-share media, including pre-fire and post-fire condition, ecological detail, survivors
I do have bias. I am a hypervigilant local assessing the response to a destructive wildfire with severe infrastructure ramifications as exemplary down to the Jiminy Cricket level of detail in social ecology. Others may argue the article does not warrant the detail. I disagree and think the event has case study value, whether or not this is explicit in reliable sources. It is not asserted in namespace, but that's how I see it. This does not mean any performance within the incident found to be sub-optimal does not exist, but it would certainly warrant good sourcing, as I hoped to provide. Some chickens are presumed to have perished, per CBS, but I get the feeling that other folks feel this is too much detail.ClaudeReigns (talk) 22:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
