Talk:Alan Davie

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Scan 20200402 7-Colorized.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article text

TheMemeMonarch suggests that this article text has been copy-pasted from elsewhere. Having written the original stub article 15 years ago and added further text and a variety of references to develop the article (particularly the musical aspect) since then, I am keen to refute that this article was copied into here. That is not to say that the text resulting from 15 years of piecemeal additions isn't a bit lumpy and could benefit from the prose being freshened. AllyD (talk) 07:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, perhaps TheMemeMonarch could give some indication of what source(s) he/she thinks stuff might have been copied from? Meanwhile, AllyD, how comfortable are you with the content that was added on 1 September 2008, apparently sourced to The Story of Modern Art by Norbert Lynton? It makes me a little uneasy, to say the least. Do you by any chance have access to that book? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're thinking of this set of additions by Cahier? Overall I wouldn't disagree with what it is saying (it is consistent with a lecture/improvision by Davie which I attended around 40 years ago) but do find "explosive brushwork" and "inspired soothsayer" rather over-emphatic. Unfortunately, I haven't seen that Lynton book, so I don't know whether the text here may be too close a paraphrase, but I'd be comfortable with these sentences being simplified and toned-down. AllyD (talk) 12:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It may not be copy and pasted, but it reads as if a critic wrote it and not as an encylopedic entry. Typically, this is a result of copying and pasting, but it could just be written weird. Edit: I'm going to remove the copy and paste warning for now. I put it through a plagiarism detector and it was found to be 75% plagiarized, but that could be websites plagiarizing wikipedia.TheMemeMonarch (talk) 15:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]