Talk:Sickness bag

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

I believe that the barf bag is encyclopedic. This page should be given a chance to expand, not prodded or AfD'd or speedied (it's not a dictdef). -- Plutor 16:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is true. However, a medical treatment stub does not do the subject justice. This needs to be expanded into a full blown collecting entry. Barfbagger 19:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the link to Chuckie bags as it is a commercial site. Barfbagger 13:08, 27 September2006 (UTC)

Virgin Atlantic

Currently 3 out of 4 paragraphs of the collecting section refer to a promotional campaign by a single airline. Though it probably should be mentioned, isn't it too much? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshXF (talk • contribs) 00:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Far too much, agreed. Though it should be noted that a press release is a valid primary source if care is given to avoid OR. See almost any article on a company, for examples. Ideally they should use Template:Cite press release. -- Quiddity (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Names

I feel that the term "barf bag" listed in the first sentence on the article is not encyclopaedic enough ("barf" is slang in most English speaking areas of which I know) and should be removed or moved to another section. Any disagreements? Theoboyd (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing then. Theoboyd (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]