Talk:Aimpoint

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / Nordic / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

On 13 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Aimpoint AB to Aimpoint. The result of the discussion was moved.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aimpoint AB. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110825033137/http://procnet.pica.army.mil/Reference/articles/Archives/multiyear.htm to http://procnet.pica.army.mil/Reference/articles/Archives/multiyear.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Product listing in article

I do not think that the Aimpoint article should contain a listing of Aimpoint products. Consider the similar pages: EOTech, Trijicon, ELCAN - none of these include product listings. I would like to work toward some sort of consensus on this issue, as I have now removed the product listing twice and do not want to create an edit war. I am not an experienced Wikipedia editor, so do not know which policies to reference, but I recall instructions that product and company pages should avoid sounding like an advertisement, and I think that such a comprehensive enumeration of products verges into that territory. Onionize-the-workers (talk) 23:14, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Since it was re-added without comment I have reverted the edit per WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:BRD. It is excessive and not encyclopedic per the guideline. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 02:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 20:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aimpoint AB → Aimpoint – "AB" is similar to Inc (U.S.) or Limited (UK), and is usually only included in article titles as disambiguation when the common name would be confusing (e.g. Apple Inc. to differentiate from Apple. However, there is nothing which sounds like "Aimpoint", the closest thing being aiming point which is sufficiently different to not cause confusion. Elshad (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.