Jump to content

Talk:Ahmed al-Haznawi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.--KGV (Talk) 05:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dubious anthrax connection

[edit]

I think it is unlikely that a committed terrorist would seek medical treatment for a lesion if he knew it was due to handling anthrax. Seeking treatment would possibly blow the security on his operation. Hopefully public health department protocols direct them to report every anthrax infection to security officials. -- Geo Swan 13:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note of interest, that al-Haznawi seems to have been the youngest hijacker, of ones we have birthdates for. *shrugs* There's trivial information for ya! Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 13:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photocopy of his German passport should be held by the FBI, given by landlord Charles Lisa. Any sign of a copy of this lying around anywhere? Please? Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 08:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The Attack

[edit]

After the attacks, al-Haznawi's brother Ahmad Ibrahim told the Arab News that the photograph published by the FBI bore no resemblance to his brother.[1]

Source: "Abdul Rahman Al-Haznawi, brother of another suspect, Ahmad Ibrahim Al-Haznawi, said the picture published on Thursday by some local newspapers did not resemble his brother. “There is no similarity between the photo published and my brother,” he told Al-Madinah newspaper. He said he does not believe his brother was involved in the attacks. “He never had any such intention,” he stated categorically."

Should this really stay? A lot of the stories of living hijackers have proven to be wrong. The FBI only released their pictures the 27th of september 2001 and the article was published 22 September 2001. His brother probably saw one of the wrong photographs that circulated shortly after the attacks, and weren't actually distributed by the FBI. --Sloane 13:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the sentence to properly reflect the source: "After the attacks, before the release of the FBI pictures of the hijackers, Arab News reported that al-Haznawi's brother Abdul Rahman had told Al-Madinah newspaper that a photograph published by local newspapers bore no resemblance to his brother."[2]

I still believe it should just be deleted though. --Sloane 13:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point. Neither Cooperative Research nor What Really Happened (2 of the more reputable conspiracy sites) but any credence in any claim Haznawi could be alive. Neither do any of the far-out sites I've looked at. We don't know what photo Abdul Rahman al-Haznawi was looking at. Does this merit a mention in the article? Any other opinions? – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 13:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I feel it does merit mention, though like 99.9999% of the world, I don't really put any stock into claims he's still alive. Still, we're not here to decide what conclusions we should be leading the reader to draw, just to present "everything encyclopaedic that's known about an infamous terrorist", and the fact his brother spoke to a newspaper decrying it is valid. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 14:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Alhaznawi video aljazeera.jpg

[edit]

File:Alhaznawi video aljazeera.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ahmed al-Haznawi. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ahmed al-Haznawi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flight 93

[edit]

Was Ahmed Al Hazmawi inside the cockpit of flight 93 when it crashed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachbarbo (talkcontribs) 21:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]