Talk:Agreed Measures for the Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agreed Measures for the Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Agreed Measures for the Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Parties?
[edit]What does the question mark mean? Does no editor know, or has it not been signed by anyone yet? --Pstanton (talk) 19:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Changed class
[edit]From Stub (assigned in 2007) to B-class, to reflect recent improvements to the article. David notMD (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 14:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Agreed Measures for the Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora, in 1964, established the first international rules for wildlife conservation in Antarctica? Source: "These measures, the first within the Treaty regime to control human actions, were intended to conserve Antarctic fauna and flora..."; abstract of Antonello 2014
5x expanded by Bambixie (talk). Nominated by Andrew Gray (talk) at 22:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC).
- This article is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)