This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
i originally came to the Talk page to note that an aryballos doesn't have just one shape, and an aryballos and a lekythos can function in the same way, so the caption for the first image seemed a bit clunky. but in reading through the other comments (to see if the caption had already been addressed) i saw some of the same issues being raised repeatedly, so i read the whole article and thought i'd try to clear it up by rewriting to make what were opinions into "possible facts." it's a bit weasel-y, but until there are actual sources cited here that can be checked, it seems better than leaving obvious opinions stated as facts. i also edited the picture's caption.Colbey84 (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
meant to add--i changed the section "Cultural references to the rebirth mythology" to simply "Cultural references" because the few cultural references given as examples didn't refer to the rebirth of Adonis. Shelley's work talked about "rebirth" only in the sense that a person doesn't die but instead "moves on" (or whatever). it certainly wasn't using the Adonis myth as a life-death-rebirth meme as it was often used/portrayed/believed in the mystery religions--that of sacrifice/death and rebirth, in the flesh, in the world. i know this article made several attempts to put Adonis in that category, but there weren't any sources cited to back that up (beyond the opinion of an individual, and even those sources aren't properly cited). i have no idea what the Syrian poet's work is like.Colbey84 (talk) 17:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just because all information in the lede should reappear in the body—
—doesn't mean that all the information in the body needs to be stuffed into the lede. (Coming here rather than turn this into an edit war, Katolophyromai.) I genuinely thought, scanning down the page, that some editor must have mistakenly pasted the text twice instead of once. The lede could still note the existence of the cult of Adonis without going into the minutiae of the rites, which are more appropriate to the body text.— Preceding unsigned comment added by VeryRarelyStable (talk • contribs) 06:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@VeryRarelyStable: I agree that, given the state of the rest of the article at that time, the previous lede may not have been entirely appropriate. Based upon Katolophyromai recent edits, and edit summaries, Katolophyromai seems to agree also. I suggest we reserve judgement until Katolophyromai finishes with his current edits. If at that point we are still dissatisfied with the lede, we can discuss the issue here. Paul August☎15:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine with me. As an aside, taking a brief look at the article, I was surprised not to see some mention of Adonis' occurence in the Catalogue of Women, see Hesiod F106, F107 Most (pp. 176, 177) = F139 Merkelbach-West). Paul August☎19:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Paul August: Thanks for bringing that up. I will make sure to add mention of that. There are still a lot of things that are missing from the body of this article that really ought to be here. --Katolophyromai (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Given that his name wasn't Greek, that the cult itself wasn't Greek, that the origins weren't Greek, how is this an appropriate summary? Anactoriaa (talk) 17:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is a general interest encyclopedia, the lead and overview of an article are going to follow what is considered standard by other third-party sources, and most tertiary sources identify the subject with Greek mythology (e.g. dicts, encycs). The origins can be reserved for later in the lead or body. Gotitbro (talk) 13:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi (I should think of something else to start these with lol) I think that the old image is better. The new image is positioned in such a way that makes it confusing. Not only that but the lighting also makes it confusing and the background is confusing as well. The old image looks better overall. Ghost_Cacus (talk) 19:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From the article :"there is no trace of a Semitic deity connected with Adonis or a parallel counterpart."
Is this not blatantly false?
Also from the article: " most modern scholars consider the story of Aphrodite and Adonis to be derived from a Levantine [my emphasis] version of the earlier Mesopotamian myth of Inanna (Ishtar) and Dumuzid (Tammuz)."
Tammuz is the Semitic form of Dumuzid. Tammuz is mentioned in the Epic of Gilgamesh, a Semitic text. https://uruk-warka.dk/Gilgamish/The%20Epic%20of%20Gilgamesh.pdf
Tammuz is mentioned in the Old Testament, also a Semitic text. https://biblehub.com/ezekiel/8-14.htmBruceman138 (talk) 07:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both Jerome and Origen who lived in what is today Israel identify Adonis with Tammuz. If you check the sources you see that the phrasing is based on a selective reference to a polemic text.--Berig(talk)16:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I move the problematic text here: "although there is no trace of a Semitic deity connected with Adonis or a parallel counterpart.[1][2]". If we look at the source it says: "See Burkert 1985: 176f., arguing against Kretschmer, e.g. Kretschmer Glotta 7 (1916): 29ff. and Kretschmer Glotta 10 (1920): 235f." Selecting a piece of information that is clearly polemic is what is called "cherry-picking", i.e. selecting the specific bias that the editor wants to have in the article, pretending it to be uncontroversial. To make things worse, the editor also added the source of the source making it look to the casual reader like two different sources backing up the same piece of information.-Berig(talk)10:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
References
^Beekes, Robert S.P. (2009) Etymological Dictionary of Greek, Brill. p. 23. "Supposed to be a loan from Semitic (Hebr. adon 'Lord'). But no cult connected with this name is known in the Semitic world, nor a myth parallel to that in Greece".
^Burkert, Walter (1991). Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical. Wiley. p. 177. For all that, there is in Semitic tradition no known cult connected with this title which corresponds exactly to the Greek cult, to say nothing of a counterpart to the Greek Adonis myth.
An article that you have been involved in editing—Adonis—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Louie (talk) 00:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)