Talk:Ad fraud
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 July 2020 and 28 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ReinaChanel.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 8 September 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move, therefore, not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Ad fraud → Advertising fraud – "Ad" is an informal abbreviation. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:24, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Per WP:CONSISTENCY with Ad blocking, ad rotation, et cetera, et cetera. I did, however, make the suggested move location into a redirect, since that makes sense.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Nom has not provided a clear policy-based reason to support the proposed move. "Ad fraud" is widely used in reliable sources. AusLondonder (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment @LaundryPizza03: I would like to see some Gbook evidence please. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Legality
[edit]The article doesn't say anything about the legality of ad fraud. Information about this would be relevant. Is it legally considered fraud, or is it just a jargon term (in the way that "piracy" isn't actually piracy)? Have there been legal cases in this area?--Exjerusalemite (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)