Jump to content

Talk:42nd Military Police Brigade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article42nd Military Police Brigade has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:42nd Military Police Brigade (United States)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Well done.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here.
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    It would be best if the references use the {{cite web}} format.
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both points accomplished. -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 21:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you to Ed for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo problem

[edit]

There is a photo in the article with a caption "Brigade soldiers mourning a fallen comrade at a ceremony in Iraq". Aside from the fact that it shows only one soldier, not soldiers, the soldier is clearly wearing a 101st patch on his left shoulder. If you enlarge it, you can see the patch on his right shoulder is also from the 101st. He is not a 42nd MP Bde. soldier. While it is a good pic, it really doesn't belong in this article. I'm removing it. If anyone objects, please let me know. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see from the Photo caption on the source site, the Soldier is very much a part of the brigade still, he's just wearing the patch because the battalion he is attatched to is under the command of the Task Force headed by the 101st Airborne. Patches are worn displaying the division headquarters the unit falls under at the time, and for that deployment, the 42nd MP brigade fell under the 101st Airborne's control. -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 20:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 42nd Military Police Brigade (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 42nd Military Police Brigade (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

595th MP Co

[edit]

I was deployed with the 595th to Afghanistan. If dates are important for you, we were deployed there November of 2011 to November of 2012! We controlled the Detention Facility in Parwan (DFIP) at Camp Sabalu-Harrison and other detention operations. 149.101.1.115 (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:42nd_Military_Police_Brigade&oldid=1197041692"