Talk:335th Fighter Squadron

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Copyright violation

I contest that this article is not a copyright violation. My reasoning for this is the fact that this material comes from an official US Air Force page. And since all branches of the US military, and Government release their documents in the public domain, this article should be no different. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 22:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the original page (if it is the original page - there seem to be several possibilities) says

It is not at all clear to me whether "confirmed" means "checked" or "copied", nor whether an official US government source using copyrighted material makes it public domain. -- ALoan (Talk) 00:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(This seems to be a closer match for the original page, BTW - note the last paras). For what it's worth, I honestly believe that "confirmed" there means "checked", not 'copied'; equivalent articles are there for all other 4th FG squadrons, but the 335th FS seems to have created their own webpage, reused that history, and added a note that someone checked it. Shimgray | talk | 01:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fine - if you are happy, I am happy. At the least, we ought to cite the source, no? -- ALoan (Talk) 02:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should cite its source, and presently Shimgray has made it so. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 04:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. (I don't normally try to argue for leniency on copyright disputes, but this'n just smells right). I'll make sure it's added - in fact, I'll have a quick wikify, source and rewrite just now. Shimgray | talk | 02:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I need to learn a better definition of "quick"... done now. Shimgray | talk | 04:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, nice work. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 04:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong timeliness for 335 deployments

I served 335 from 1966 to 1970 They were flying f4c and f4d from 1966 to 1970. 335 deployed to Korea kusan jan to June 1968 during publeo.. nato exercise rigi Norway march to april 1969 Deployed to Korea jan to may 1970 kusan Korea. They were fullfing nuke duty 184.170.75.40 (talk) 15:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]