Talk:2015 Bahrain GP2 Series round
Appearance
![]() | 2015 Bahrain GP2 Series round has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 30, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2015 Bahrain GP2 Series round article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Bahrain GP2 Series round/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- " while Lazarus and Rapax rounded out the top five" Lazarus is already linked in the lead
- "The first race was held over either 170 kilometres (110 mi)" - why is metric first?
- It is the standard for the GP2 races to place kilometres first just like in Formula One. MWright96 (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Take my advice and nominate this for FA as soon as you can! JAGUAR 20:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Haha, tempting but not quite yet. Needs a little more expansion work before FA can be realistic. ;) MWright96 (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)