Talk:2014 Monaco Grand Prix

2014 Monaco Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 26, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Monaco Grand Prix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Formula One Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Microstates: Monaco Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Monaco portal This article is supported by WikiProject Monaco.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on 2014 Monaco Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 Monaco Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review will follow shortly. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that I completely forgot about this review... will give it very soon, so sorry! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Zwerg Nase: Still haven't heard anything regarding this review. Is everything alright? I understand fully if real life commitments are taking priority. MWright96 (talk) 20:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am unbelievable sorry this took so long, the past few weeks have been crazy RL-wise. Here we go now:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

What needs to be done:

Citation needed also for the statements in the first sentence of the Background section.
- Have used the FIA preview reference to source the unreferenced statement. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You could mention why practice takes place on Thursday earlier and in more detail.
- Added a note which says the reasoning behind the lack of Friday running. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Qualifying section: You should make it clearer that cars in Q3 are not allowed to change tyres for the race, so far, one could understand it in a way that they are not allowed to change during quali.
- This should be somewhat more easier to understand. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You should give the year of the Japanese GP in which Bianchi sustained his fatal injuries.
- Done MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I know this is not easy to source, but it would be great to point out that Whiting's suggestion of an additional minute of quali in the case of yellow flags did not come into effect.
- Unfortunately, despite my very best efforts, i could not locate a source for your suggested statement. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, a very well written article with just those minor points to adress. I have made some minor changes myself were I felt they were needed. I will try to do the other review today as well, tomorrow the latest. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Zwerg Nase: I have made changes to all but one of your suggestions. See my reply to the fifth suggestion. MWright96 (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty, I can pass this now. Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]