Talk:2014 Beijing ePrix
![]() | A fact from 2014 Beijing ePrix appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Despereately needs more than blank tables
[edit]Are two sentences that do no more than establish the race exists all that can be managed for an inaugural international series on Day 2 of the event? --Falcadore (talk) 01:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not many editors are interested, and I would help but the Formula E website seems unable to cope with the amount of traffic it is generating. Holdenman05 (talk) 01:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Secondary sources are more important than primary sources as they indicate the notability of the series outside of its own sphere. Reliance on the official website is not a good idea. --Falcadore (talk) 01:39, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- I see your point, but official information is required at this point and the only information I can judge to be correct at the moment would be coming from the series' official website, the FIA website or teams' websites/social media. This why I kept undoing the additions of Charles Pic in the drivers' table - I wasn't sure how reliable the sources were. Holdenman05 (talk) 01:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Official information does not establish notability. THAT is what is required. Additionally as practice has begun, Charles Pic's presence in the series should become obvious. --Falcadore (talk) 01:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Once Pic was officially announced last night I let his inclusion and the source stay. Holdenman05 (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Still nothing to do with notability, the primary means of inclusion in wikipedia. In its current form this article would fail an AFD and be deleted because of the lack of notability. --Falcadore (talk) 04:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Once Pic was officially announced last night I let his inclusion and the source stay. Holdenman05 (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Official information does not establish notability. THAT is what is required. Additionally as practice has begun, Charles Pic's presence in the series should become obvious. --Falcadore (talk) 01:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- I see your point, but official information is required at this point and the only information I can judge to be correct at the moment would be coming from the series' official website, the FIA website or teams' websites/social media. This why I kept undoing the additions of Charles Pic in the drivers' table - I wasn't sure how reliable the sources were. Holdenman05 (talk) 01:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Secondary sources are more important than primary sources as they indicate the notability of the series outside of its own sphere. Reliance on the official website is not a good idea. --Falcadore (talk) 01:39, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 Beijing ePrix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140913125559/http://www.fiaformulae.com/en/results/beijing-eprix.aspx to http://www.fiaformulae.com/en/results/beijing-eprix.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140913125559/http://www.fiaformulae.com/en/results/beijing-eprix.aspx to http://www.fiaformulae.com/en/results/beijing-eprix.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)