Talk:2008 Super 14 season

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rugby union Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Top Try Socrers

I'm interested to the source of the appearance figures in the Top Try Scorer section. The 'Stats' link gives info of the number of tries socred by each player, but not the number of appearances. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.54.86.228 (talk) 11:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There were a number of other players who also scored 5 tries, including Rudi Wulf, Adam Thomson, Hosea Gear, Aaron Bancroft, and Andrew Ellis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonojono1551 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of ELV:s

allblacks.co.nz (http://www.allblacks.co.nz/index.cfm?layout=showS14News&newsArticle=7318), also claims that the new rules about out-on-the-full applying when the ball was brought back into the 22 will be used. That is, in addition to those new laws listed on the page. Does anybody have a source that says differently? /85.194.44.18 (talk) 17:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'd say that thats right- here's a page on the ARU website explaining things clearly:

http://aru.rugby.com.au/get_onside/newsletter/article/080131_feature_one,77214.html/newsletter/77217

Perhaps this could be used as a reference and citing as such, the wording is quite good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.154.17 (talk) 05:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonus Points Problem

The bonus points column does not match up with offical stats (www.super14.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.63.105 (talk) 06:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crowd Figures

Does anyone believe them? The figures coming out of some of the Australian franchises are laughable, should we really have them as though they're a fact?Ticklemygrits (talk) 11:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For example? - Shudde ^talk 11:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Super 14 logo.png

The image Image:Super 14 logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 Super 14 season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602041847/http://www.super14.com/news/viewarticle.asp?id=13446 to http://www.super14.com/news/viewarticle.asp?id=13446

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]