Jump to content

Talk:2001 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Todo

[edit]

Good writing and content, just needs more on each storm. Jdorje 19:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Track maps! All storms have been added with images. Good kitty 15:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's complete, but needs editing for language usage and clarity, and inline sources. Good kitty 22:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inline references

[edit]

We need inline references for this article per the Wikipedia guide of style. I smacked a no reference banner on the article until refs or notes are added to it. Thegreatdr 22:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

[edit]

This should get an article for Flossie because we do articles for EVERY storm that Effects the US. Also, It's death toll is rather high. Leave Message orYellow Evan home 13:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Rating

[edit]

I've reduced this article to a C rating as I do not believe the Grammar criterion has been adequately met or properly checked. My reasoning behind this is that whilst reading the section on Hurricane Gil, I noticed a few grammatical errors which hinder you from properly reading that section of the article. Examples:

  • 'the tropical wave began to show sign of developed as it neared'
  • 'After weakened to a category 1 hurricane'
  • 'Gil was near the edge of the associated with deep convection.'

JonEastham (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2001 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2001 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Hurricane Henriette (2001)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hurricane Henriette (2001). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 25#Hurricane Henriette (2001) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 09:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm 2-C

[edit]

So when and how did TD 2C get upgraded to a tropical storm? The 2001 CPHC report has TD 2C, but IBTRACS lists a 35 kt peak, so I get why editors made it an unnamed storm, but I'd like a bit more context. Yellow Evan (talk · contribs)? Anyone else? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its not just IBTRACS that lists it as a 35 kt TS but HURDAT and I think it comes from a CPHC spreadsheet (CPHC ReBest 1966-2003) that was knocking around for a few years, however, I suspect that @ABC paulista: will know more about it.Jason Rees (talk) 01:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CPHC Rebest has it as a TD, with some minor differences in coordinates compared to CPHC's report. However, from the page's history I found that Modokai cited some kind of 2020 re-analysis that could justify this assessement if valid, since it's more recent than the Rebest, so maybe he could elaborate further about it. ABC paulista (talk) 03:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After @ABC paulista:'s comments, I did some checking through old versions of HURDAT and I think we need to speak to the NHC/CPHC about this system, since the 35 kts has been in HURDAT since at least 2014.Jason Rees (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the time being, I'd argue that we should follow CPHC Rebest, since it's not the first time that there are disagreements between NHC/HURDAT and CPHC, and since the system was inside CPHC's AoR, their assessement should take preference over HURDAT. ABC paulista (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email asking for some clarification. Thanks ABC for putting that list together for the disagreements. Ideally those wouldn't be the case, but I agree, if it's in CPHC's AoR and it's listed in their database, we should go with them. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:2001_Pacific_hurricane_season&oldid=1227097626"