Jump to content

Talk:1992 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jason Rees (talk · contribs) 01:29, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Over the next few days i plan to review this article for GAN.Jason Rees (talk) 01:29, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was the least active hurricane season in nine years due to a strong El Niño that lasted from 1991 to 1994 - That implies that the El Nino lasted from 91-94 without a break which is wrong.
I removed that part about 1991-1994, since apparently it isn't true or falsely implying something.--12george1 (talk) 18:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead would make more sense if the info about Frances was moved down to make a paragraph with the Andrew stuff.
Done--12george1 (talk) 18:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Were there any other seasonal predictions by any other agency such as the Weather Research Center.
I did find some stuff from the Weather Research Center, but there was no specific numbers (i.e. number of tropical storms, hurricanes, major hurricanes).--12george1 (talk) 18:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you can refind that stuff on the WRC, id suggest that you add it with this, i dont know how accurate it is though.
Ok, now it is fixed.--12george1 (talk) 23:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now that the stuff on systems of the year has been moved down i think that the stuff about the depressions should be moved down to the end of Frances.
  • I also think that the two paragraphs of the lead should be combined since they arent that big.
  • It was a below average season in which 10 tropical depressions formed. Seven of the depressions attained tropical storm status, and four of these attained hurricane status. In addition, one tropical cyclone eventually attained major hurricane status,[5] which is below the 1950-2005 average of two per season - 1 check this sentence against the infobox and two maybe higher the average to the 2010 one though i would prefer it if you found an average at the time.
  • Im asking you to either use the average to 2010 or find a better one that is say 1962-1991.
  • Why did activity suddenly halt in the mid of october?
  • Was Frances extratropical or dissipated - these are two separate things.
  • Delink the timeline as it is most probably a case of overlinking.
  • Move the timeline up to the start of the seasonal summ section.
  • Im surprised that you dont mention the fact that SS1 was rather close to being classified as Tropical.
  • There would be Tropical Storm Ana in April of the 2003 season - shorten to April 2003 and link it.
  • I have taken the liberty of cleaning up your coding of the seasonal forecasst section and have a couple of questions
    • Surely Bill Gray issued a June forecast
    • Whats the + symbol for
    • Why are you using the current average and why not the average from 1960-1990.
  • Bearing in mind that people are not stupid and there is already a better key in the article, why have Template:SSHS Small in the article?.

I think your seasonal activity section should be a bit fuller of bits about the season. eg: Use this http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0493%281994%29122%3C0539%3AATSO%3E2.0.CO%3B2 and http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0493%281994%29122%3C0517%3AAHSO%3E2.0.CO%3B2 this a bit more