This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is sourced to one national archives page and is more or less copied from there. This article could be better and I could see a strong argument for draftifying. So why did I accept it?
The article text is OGL and that's a free licence. Attribution makes it fine.
The subject is obviously notable from a cursory Bing search. There are contemporaneous news articles on the riots in Glasgow and Liverpool. [1]
While we have 1919 South Wales race riots, this article could provide a broader overview of the subject for all of the UK.
Taking this all into consideration, I'd say it's more likely than not this wouldn't be deleted or draftified at AfD. Merely being a stub with one source doesn't mean it can't be accepted at AfC. Though I would hope to see this improved, hopefully by the person who submitted it. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 13:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]