Talk:1915 Vanderbilt Commodores football team
Appearance
![]() | 1915 Vanderbilt Commodores football team has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 29, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1915 Vanderbilt Commodores football team/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- "The outlook for the upcoming 1915 Vanderbilt football season was not good" - tad informal, try unsatisfactory
Done
- "To add to this, only 10 experienced players from the previous year were returning to the team" - Additionally
Done
- "In the third quarter, Johnny Floyd ripped off 47 yards and Hubert Wiggs took it over." - this is a duplink
Done
- "The 1915 Vanderbilt football team scored a grand total of 514 points in 510 minutes of actual playing time, thus ranking them as a legitimate "point-a-minute" team. Vanderbilt averaged 51.4 points a game. Vanderbilt led the nation in scoring, then one of few stats kept." - this needs a citation
Done
- All harvrefs leading to the Vanderbilt Football: Tales of Commodore Gridiron History book are broken and need to be fixed
Done
- "The outlook for the upcoming 1915 Vanderbilt football season was not good" - tad informal, try unsatisfactory
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The article is well researched and mostly well written, however I found a few issues. Once they're dealt with, this should be good to go. JAGUAR 17:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I can see that all of the issues have been dealt with so this should be good to go.
JAGUAR 16:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)