Jump to content

Talk:1159 papal election/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Have performed a minor copyedit to remove MoS. The lead need to be extended considerably, probably fivefold. Remember to mention all parts of the article; the lead is to summarize, not introduce, the article.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The bibliography section should cite books within {{cite book}}. All-caps titles should be converted to lower caps—all caps is a matter of typography and not grammar or spelling. The first paragraph under "Death of Adrian IV" should be referenced. Ref 25 and 35 should be in the {{cite web}} template.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Placing on hold until the addressed matters have been seen to. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to express them here. Arsenikk (talk) 15:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's all done now. CarlosPn 22 Oct 2008 15:35 CET

Congratulations with a Good Article! Arsenikk (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]