Jump to content

Pratt Contractors Ltd v Palmerston North City Council

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pratt Contractors Ltd v Palmerston North City Council
CourtHigh Court of New Zealand
Full case name Pratt Contractors Ltd v Palmerston North City Council
Decided13 December 1994
Citation[1995] 1 NZLR 469
Court membership
Judge sittingGallen J

Pratt Contractors Ltd v Palmerston North City Council [1995] 1 NZLR 469 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding contract formation involving tenders.[1][2]

Background

[edit]

The Palmerston North City Council put out for tender the construction of a flyover. The tender documents set out detailed criteria and plans for the construction of the flyover, and was to be awarded to the lowest tenderer.

However, a rival contractor submitted a tender for the construction of a redesigned flyover that involved less earth works, and the council subsequently accepted that tender, without giving the other tenderers the opportunity to submit a tender for the new design.

After discovering all this, Pratt Contractors sued the council for damages for loss of profits they would of received if they had won the tender..

Held

[edit]

The court held that the city council tender was a legally binding obligation, and as a result the city council should have given Pratt Contractors the opportunity to revise and resubmit their tender. The court awarded damages of $17,822 for reimbursement of the costs in preparing the tender. On top of this, damages for $200,000 for loss of profit was also awarded.

Footnote: The judge noted that the council could have alternatively accepted none of the tenders instead.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. [page needed]. ISBN 0-86472-555-8.
  2. ^ Walker, Campbell (2004). Butterworths Student Companion Contract (4th ed.). LexisNexis. pp. 8–9. ISBN 0-408-71770-X.