Osmotherly Rules
The Osmotherly Rules, named for their author, a civil servant in the Machinery of Government Division of the British Cabinet Office named E. B. C. Osmotherly, are a set of internal guidelines specifying how government departments should provide evidence to parliamentary select committees.[1] Covering procedures for both the House of Lords and the House of Commons, it has "no formal Parliamentary standing or approval, nor does it claim to have."[2]
History
[edit]Although they were first formally issued in May 1980, a similar document had been circulating throughout the 1970s. They were "prepared entirely for use within Government"[3] and had no official status in Parliament. An early edition of the rules was caught up in the Westland affair, a political scandal in which the ministers were worried that officials being questioned by committees about individual conduct could be harmful; they were criticised as "unduly restrictive".[1]
The current edition dates from October 2014, and was issued by Francis Maude as the Minister for the Cabinet Office under the name of Giving Evidence to Select Committees: guidance for civil servants.[4]
Content
[edit]As to an overarching principle the rules state that civil servants ("officials") are not directly accountable to Parliament; rather, Secretaries of State, Ministers of State, Parliamentary Under-Secretaries of State and Parliamentary Private Secretaries (as the elected/appointed agents of the Crown) are so accountable to Parliament. Their civil servants, essentially carrying out actions under ministerial powers and authority, are merely responsible to them, and thus cannot be summoned by Select Committees, as they are protected by the same rule that prevents Members of Parliament being summoned.[5] In general, if there is a dispute about the attendance of an official, the relevant minister should attend instead as a matter of courtesy.[5]
Other issues the rules provide guidance on include the:
- limitations of Select Committees' powers to "send for persons, papers and records",[6]
- procedures on committees summoning retired officials
- parliamentary privilege
- the point at which the cost of supplying information is considered excessive
- the rules of sub judice (current, likely and pending litigation privilege)
- withholding and redaction of evidence on the grounds of national security and public interest.[1][2]
The tests used in the most recent edition are based on those used by civil servants when considering the extent to which a Freedom of Information request should be acceded to.[7]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c Gay, Oonagh (4 August 2005). "The Osmotherly Rules (Standard Note: SN02671)". Parliament and Constitution Centre, House of Commons Library. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- ^ a b Osmotherly (Machinery of Government Division, Cabinet Office), E. B. C. (July 2005). Departmental Evidence and Responses to Select Committees. Cabinet Office. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- ^ Memorandum of Guidance for Civil Servants Appearing before Select Committees [Dep 8664]
- ^ "Departmental evidence and response to select committees: Guidance". 17 October 2014.
- ^ a b "Factsheet G6: Disciplinary and Penal Powers of the House of Commons". House of Commons Information Office. November 2012. p. 10. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
- ^ "Standing Orders of the House of Commons" (PDF). Standing Order 152(4)(a). House of Commons. 2009. p. 174. Retrieved 22 May 2009.
- ^ "What is the public interest test?". Department for Constitutional Affairs. Archived from the original on 12 May 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2010.