Draft talk:Nicoleta Nedelcu
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]It would be good to find some independent third-party reviews of Nedelcu’s contribution to her disciplines. The article currently makes too much use of self-written biographical notes on academia.edu, researchgate, staff page at Mount Royal University, and probably the globaljournals.org page. --Northernhenge (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: @Zdrada, you have created enough BKPs of notable scientists that you should know that she is far from meeting any of the WO:NPROF criteria. WP:TOOSOON by many years.