Draft:Edilson Paca
| Submission declined on 11 February 2025 by Devonian Wombat (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 6 December 2024 by Jamiebuba (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Jamiebuba 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 6 December 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Bonadea 2 months ago. | |
Comment: References 3 and 4 are interviews, which are primary sources and do not contribute to notability. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Edilson Paca (born May 23, 1999) is an Angolan investor[1][2] currently residing in the United States[3]. According to Forbes Africa Lusófona, he is considered one of the key figures in electronic trading in Angola[1]. In 2024, Paca was named one of the Forbes 30 Under 30[1] in the finance category.
Paca is renowned for his influence in Angola and has been featured in several prominent publications, magazines in the country.[4][1][3]
On his first ever podcast, he massed over 40,000 views in 2 weeks on Youtube.
Edilson Paca | |
|---|---|
| Born | Jorge Paca May 23, 1999 |
| Occupation | Investor |
| Years active | 2018–present |
| Known for | Reference in electronic trading in Angola |
| Honours | 30 Under 30 Forbes Africa Lusófona [1] |
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Sebastião, Sita (2024-05-20). "30 Under 30 by Forbes África lusófona". Forbes África Lusófona (in European Portuguese). Retrieved 2024-12-08.
- ^ "Individual/Angel: Edilson Paca Jr". Najafi Capital Deal Making Platform. Retrieved 2024-12-08.
- ^ a b "Edilson Paca: o jovem que deixou Angola rumo aos EUA para ser piloto e se tornou trader". VerAngola (in Portuguese). 2023-04-21. Retrieved 2024-12-08.
- ^ "Edilson Paca Jr: "Para se ser trader, é preciso estudar bem a mente humana" - A voz da Diáspora". vozdadiaspora.com (in European Portuguese). 2023-04-11. Retrieved 2024-12-08.
This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.
Categories: