Draft:Copyleaks
| Submission declined on 18 July 2024 by Myrealnamm (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Type of site | SaaS for AI Content and Plagiarism Detection |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Stamford, CT |
| Area served | Worldwide |
| Founder(s) | Alon Yamin and Yehonatan Bitton |
| CEO | Alon Yamin |
| Industry | Education |
| URL | copyleaks |
| Registration | Yes |
Copyleaks is a plagiarism detection platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to identify similar and identical content across various formats.[1][2]
Copyleaks was founded in 2015 by Alon Yamin and Yehonatan Bitton, software developers working with text analysis, AI, machine learning, and other cutting-edge technologies.[1][2][3]
Copyleaks’ product suite is used by businesses, educational institutions, and individuals to identify potential plagiarism and AI-generated content in order to provide transparency around responsible AI adoption.[4][5][6]
In 2022, Copyleaks raised $7.75 million to expand its anti-plagiarism capabilities.[7]
Functionality
[edit]Copyleaks is used in academia to detect plagiarism, paraphrasing, and potential copyright violations.[5][8][9] The release of AI models and rapid adoption has led to students increasingly using these tools to complete their work so Copyleaks helps to distinguish between content created by humans and content generated by AI.[5][8][9][10]
Criticism
[edit]In June 2023, an international team of academics found AI detection tools inaccurate and unreliable.[11][12] In an analysis of five AI content detection tools – Copyleaks, OpenAI, Writer, GPTZero, and CrossPlag – Copyleaks struggled with sensitivity, that is, the proportion of AI-generated content correctly identified by the detectors out of all AI-generated content.[12] Copyleaks had the highest sensitivity at 93% for content generated by ChatGPT 4.[12][13]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b "Profile of a Founder: Alon Yamin of Copyleaks". Tech Tribune. 17 March 2020. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
- ^ a b "Enhancing Academic Integrity Guardrails with AI Detection". Bloomberg. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
- ^ Deborah, Balshem. "Copyleaks mulls potential Series B for AI-generated content detection". Mergermarket. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
- ^ "Open LMS Partners With Copyleaks, Adding Advanced AI-Driven Plagiarism and AI Content Detection". eSchool News. 8 June 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
- ^ a b c "Artificial intelligence: Will it soon take the place of plagiarism?". District Administration. 3 April 2024. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
- ^ "AI Governance: Using AI Responsibly In Marketing". Leader Generation Podcast. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ^ Tiffany & Steven, Hsu & Myers (May 18, 2023). "Another Side of the A.I. Boom: Detecting What A.I. Makes". The New York Times. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ^ a b "Open LMS Partners with AI Detector to Combat Plagiarism". Campus Technology. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ^ a b "60% GPT-3.5 Outputs Plagiarised, Raises Copyright Concerns: Study". Business World. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
- ^ Kornick, Lindsay (3 January 2024). "AI platform CEO talks new tech detecting plagiarism following Harvard scandal: 'As prevalent as ever'". Fox News. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
- ^ Weber-Wulff, Anohina-Naumeca, Bjelobaba, Foltýnek, Guerrero-Dib, Popoola, Šigut, Waddington (21 June 2023). "Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text". International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19 (1): 26. arXiv:2306.15666. doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c Elkhatat, Elsaid & Almeer (1 September 2023). "Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text". International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19 (17). doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5.
- ^ Gewirtz, David. "Can AI detectors save us from ChatGPT? I tried 5 online tools to find out". ZDNET. Retrieved 20 May 2024.
External links
[edit]