Jump to content

Discovery and development of TRPV1 antagonists

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relief from chronic pain remains a recognized unmet medical need. Consequently, the search for new analgesic agents is being intensively studied by the pharmaceutical industry. The TRPV1 receptor is a ligand gated ion channel that has been implicated in mediation of many types of pain and therefore studied most extensively. The first competitive antagonist, capsazepine, was first described in 1990; since then, several TRPV1 antagonists have entered clinical trials as analgesic agents. Should these new chemical entities relieve symptoms of chronic pain, then this class of compounds may offer one of the first novel mechanisms for the treatment of pain in many years.[clarification needed][1][2]

History

[edit]
Figure 1. Chili pepper

Capsaicin, the active ingredient in chili pepper, was first isolated over a century ago. In 1919 the exact chemical structure of capsaicin was determined and the complete synthesis of the compound was achieved a decade later. Capsaicin has been used as an analgesic for decades, but the therapeutic potential of capsaicin was first recognized as early as 1850.[3] The discovery that the pungency of capsaicin is mediated through TRPV1 set the stage for further research of the function of the TRPV1 receptor, and preclinical studies showed evidence of its importance in numerous human diseases.[1][4] These are the first agents acting by this mechanism that made their way into clinic for evaluation of their use as possible analgesics and therefore important targets for drug development. Many discoveries are yet to be made, both in terms of the range of potential therapeutic applications in addition to analgesia for TRPV1 antagonists and it was only in the last decade where there has been a full understanding of the molecular mechanism. In the years to come it will be clearer if TRPV1 antagonists can fulfill their potential.[1][5][6]

Vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1/TRPV1 receptor)

[edit]

The vanilloid receptor (TRPV1) is one of six sub-members that belong to the transient receptor potential channel (TRP) superfamily. TRPV1 was the first mammalian member to be discovered and is a non-selective cation channel permeable for calcium. The receptor is made of four identical subunits each with six transmembrane segments, S1-S6, with an aqueous pore between the fifth and sixth segments. This region forms the channel conductive pore and contains the N- and C-termini on the cytosolic side of the cell membrane.[7] Capsaicin and RTX, elicit burning pain by activating a non-selective cation channel expressed on sensory nerve endings. When capsaicin was found to have analgesic effects in preclinical studies much emphasis was put into the research of the receptor/channel that capsaicin binds to and activates.[6][8] Besides being activated by capsaicin, TRPV1 also responds to a wide range of exogenous and endogenous chemical ligands as well as physical stimuli such as heat over 42 °C and changes in more diverse activators such as protons (acid, pH<6). TRPV1 is also subject to regulation by changes in membrane potential and this intrinsic voltage-dependence is thought to underlie the gating mechanism of this non-selective cation channel which leads to the influx of sodium and calcium ions. Importantly, TRPV1 activity is also subject to regulation by a host of intracellular signaling cascades such as G-protein coupled receptor signaling, that are implicated in the responses to algogenic agents, inflammatory mediators and injury.[1]

Mechanism of action

[edit]

TRPV1 is primarily expressed on, small myelinated and unmyelinated medium size, sensory neurons in dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia, where sensory neurons cluster. TRPV1 receptors are also found in muscles, joints, the urinary bladder and kidneys. The functional activity of TRPV1 has been demonstrated, within the central nervous system, in the spinal cord and specific sites in the brain including the hypothalamus, cerebellum, locus coeruleus, periaqueductal grey and cortex. Activation of TRPV1 sets off an influx of calcium and sodium ions which in turn initiates a cascade of events that result in membrane depolarization, neuronal firing and transduction of neural impulses. TRPV1 phosphorylates as a response to several algesic agents, resulting in a lower threshold of channel activation. Some substances such as bradykinin, nerve growth factor and protons have been reported to sensitize the TRPV1 receptor. Activation of TRPV1 results in the release of pro-nociceptive peptides, which decreases when treated with TRPV1 antagonists. In general, most channel antagonists bind in the pore region, interacting with residues from all four monomers of the tetrameric channel.[2][9][10]

Binding

[edit]

Ligands of the TRPV1 receptor seem to act from the intracellular side. This is an unusual property of TRPV1, where ligands of most other ligand-gated channels bind from the extracellular space. Capsaicin is highly lipophilic and can pass the plasma membrane easily. It is generally accepted that capsaicin acts on and binds to the TRPV1 receptor from the intracellular side prior to activation. The critical sites for capsaicin binding are Arg 114 and Glu 761 at the N- and C-termini of the receptor, respectively. Because these two amino acids are charged and located in the cytosolic part of TRPV1 receptor, the two regions are likely to be implicated in hydrophilic interaction of TRPV1 with vanilloids such as capsaicin and RTX. In addition to these sites in N- and C-termini of TRPV1, a region in the intracellular linker sited in the transmembrane domain, called 'the TM3 region', has been shown to be critical for hydrophobic interaction with vanilloids. The TM3 region is considered to be necessary for binding to vanilloids. It is surrounded by the hydrophobic environment because of its placement in the plasma membrane. Now it is recognized as an important link in hydrophobic interaction with capsaicin. The binding sites Arg 114 and Glu 761 and the TM3 region in TRPV1, together consist of a binding pocket to vanilloids.[9][2]

Drug design

[edit]

Agonists

[edit]
Figure 2. Chemical structure of capsaicin

Capsaicin (fig. 2), a naturally occurring vanilloid, is the best known TRPV1 agonist. Resiniferatoxin (RTX) is another naturally occurring vanilloid that exhibits TRPV1 agonistic activity. It is more potent than capsaicin and is currently in development as a sensory neuron desensitizing agent.[7] Initially, agonists were the major focus of the TRPV1 ligand development due to the analgesic effect resulting from desensitization of the receptor. However, because of an initial burning effect of all natural vanilloid receptor agonists, including capsaicin, therapy becomes complicated and perhaps ineffective. Attempts to make synthetic agonists with good separation between excitatory effects and the analgesic effects have not been successful. To avoid this persisting side effects of TRPV1 agonists, a focused consideration has been given to competitive antagonists as novel analgesic drugs.[8]

Antagonists

[edit]

Intense efforts have been carried out to design both competitive and non-competitive TRPV1 antagonists. Antagonists that bind to the agonist binding site, and lock the channel in the closed, nonconductive state are competitive antagonists. In contrast, antagonists that interact with additional binding sites on the receptor structure preventing receptor opening by the agonist or blocking its aqueous pore are non-competitive antagonists. Non-competitive antagonists acting as open channel blockers are therapeutically attractive because of their recognition of over-activated TRPV1 channels, which can reduce the potential of unwanted side effects.[7]

Pharmacophore

[edit]

The pharmacophore model for TRPV1 antagonists consists of three essential features: a hydrogen-bond acceptor, a hydrogen-bond donor, and a ring feature. In addition, the TRPV1 antagonists have been superimposed in such a way that they could fit in the volume of the TRPV1 pore. When the homology model is considered, appropriate interaction sites are found in the receptor pore. The hydrogen-bond acceptor on the ligand is proposed to interact with Tyr 667 (helix S6) on the receptor as a hydrogen-bond donor, and the hydrogen-bond donor on the ligand is proposed to interact with Tyr 667 on the opposite monomer of the tetramer on the receptor as a hydrogen-bond acceptor. The ring feature of the pharmacophore is proposed to fit in the hydrophobic space formed by the aromatic rings of the four Tyr 667 residues of the four monomers. Consistent with the critical role played by Tyr 667 in the interaction with key elements of the TRPV1 antagonist pharmacophore, site-directed mutagenesis studies have shown that exchanging this tyrosine for alanine in the rat TRPV1 receptor abolishes functional activity of TRPV1. The lipophilic end in antagonist is varied in character and volume and interacts with the lower end of transmembrane helices S5 and S6. Because the intracellular ends of these helices extend past the membrane, they are likely to be flexible and may be part of the channel opening and closing process. The combined use of a pharmacophore model, assembled from highly optimized TRPV1 antagonists, with a homology model of the protein has enhanced understanding of the observed structure–activity relationships of many series of current TRPV1 antagonists, and should be useful in the discovery of new classes of antagonists.[2]

Structure activity relationship

[edit]
Figure 3. Structure activity relationship of the capsaicin related compounds oleovanillamine and phenylacetylrivanyl.

Capsaicin (fig. 2) has three functional regions: an aromatic A region where a parent homovanillyl (3-methoxy 4-hydroxybenzyl) group is optimal, a B region known as the ester or amide linker and the aliphatic C region where a lipophilic octanyl moiety is associated with the highest potency. The homovanillyl motif and amide bond regions contain dipolar groups which are implicated in hydrogen bonding interactions.[11]

Phenolic hydroxide and amide moieties appear to be vital for inducing capsaicin responses. Removal of the phenolic hydroxide or amide bond in capsaicin analogues leads to reduction of potency. The phenolic hydroxide and amide moieties in capsaicin share potential multiple hydrogen bond interactions with the TRPV1 receptor. Capsaicinoids and capsinoids are characterized by an oxygenated aromatic moiety bound via an amide (capsaicinoids) or ester (capsinoids) linker to a lipophilic acyl group. The vanillyl and carbonyl linker contain polar groups capable of forming hydrogen bonds essential for activity, whereas the lipophilic moiety interacts with a corresponding cleft of the vanilloid binding site on TRPV1. Replacement of the medium-sized branched fatty acid of capsaicin with longer fatty acids is damaging for activity,[12] but the presence of unsaturations restores and potentiates activity e.g. oleoylvanillamine (olvanil)(fig. 3a), is 10-fold more potent than capsaicin in TRPV1 activation assays.[13]

1,3-Di(arylalkyl)thioureas

[edit]
Figure 4. Structure-activity relationship of thiourea derivatives

Capsazepine (fig. 4a), the first competitive vanilloid antagonist,[14][9] reported by Novartis group, was aimed at assessing the effect of conformational constraint on the lipophilic C-region of capsaicin. In capsazepine the amide bond of the capsaicin is replaced by a thiourea moiety and a propylidene linker between the aromatic vanillyl 2-carbon A ring and the B-linker amide nitrogen forces the aromatic ring in an orthogonal orientation with respect to the thiourea bond.[15] This constraint has long been considered as the distinctive characteristic of vanilloid antagonism.[16] Capsazepine competes for the capsaicin-binding site on TRPV1 however, due to low metabolic stability and poor pharmacokinetic properties the compound did not reach into clinical development.[17] It was observed later on that this tether was not critical for activity as powerful antagonists free from this structural feature were developed, with 1,3-di(arylalkyl)thioureas emerging as one of the most promising non-vanilloid class of TRPV1 antagonist showing excellent therapeutical potential in pain regulation. Within these compounds, the replacement of the guaiacyl moiety of capsaicinoids with a 3-fluoro-4-sulfonylamido group found critical to revert activity. This led to the design of C-region moiety mimicked on RTX, led to compound seen in figure 4b, that showed excellent analgesic activity in mice.[18][19] An alternative optimization of the lipophilic C region led to JYL1421 (fig. 4c), another promising clinical candidate.[20]

Di(arylalkyl)- and aryl(arylakyl)ureas

[edit]
Figure 5. Structure-activity relationship of urea derivatives

Several capsaicin analogs of the urea type were developed by acylation of homovanillylamine and related amines with different 4-(α-pyridyl)piperidine-1-acyl chlorides. The presence of a polar amino moiety in the hydrophobic C region of capsacinoids was crucial to couple potency and hydrophilicity, mimicking similar observations that led to the discovery of phenylacetylrinvanil (fig. 3b) from olvanil (fig. 3a). Phenylacetylrinvanil is the most potent capsaicinoid reported to date, ~500-fold more potent than capsaicin.[21] Several other ureas emerged as remarkably active TRPV1 antagonists. Compared with capsazepine, the piperazinyl urea (fig. 5a and 5b) showed a higher selectivity profile against a wide variety of enzymes and channels[22] whereas the related very potent and specific TRPV1 antagonist A-425619 (fig. 5c) could reduce pain associated with inflammation and tissue injury in rats.[23] Further research has led to a variety of small-molecule antagonists of TRPV1, including the ureas SB-705498 (fig. 5d), SB-452533 (fig. 5e)[16,17] and ABT-102(fig. 5f), compounds that have entered clinical trials.[24]

Cinnamides

[edit]
Figure 6. Structure-activity relationship of urea derivatives

N-Arylcinnamides have emerged as potent and important class of TRPV1 antagonists, Compound SB-366791, (fig. 6a) shows competitive and specific activity in both human and rat TRPV1 receptors overall profile of receptor selectivity much better than that of capsazepine.[25][26] Within this series of compounds, AMG-9810 (fig. 6b) exhibited high antagonist potency showing good oral bio-availability in rats and a promising pharmacokinetic profile, boding well for clinical efficacy.[27] Another potent blocker from this group is AMG0347(fig. 6c)that was shown in a postoperative pain trial to be able to decrease capsaicin-induced heat and mechanical hyperalgesia and to block central TRPV1 receptors.[28]

Carboxamides

[edit]
Figure 7. Structure-activity relationship of carboxamide derivatives

Several TRPV1 antagonists of the carboxamide type have been discovered. They are structurally quite heterogenous, as exemplified by comparison of the nicotinamide derivative SB-782443 (fig. 7a), the thiazolylcarboxamide (fig. 7b), and the tetrahydropyridylcarboxamide (fig. 7c).[29] SB-782443 (fig. 7a) showed excellent potency at human, guinea pig, and rat TRPV1, a favorable in vitro drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics profile, and remarkable in vivo activity in an inflammatory pain model.[30][31] Based on their in vitro profile, several compounds of this class qualified for preclinical development.[29]

Other derivatives

[edit]
Figure 8. Structure-activity relationship of unclassified derivatives

Nonclassic antagonists lack the urea, thiourea, or amide groups typical of the classic TRPV1 ligands. Two major structural types of nonclassic antagonists have been discovered. First there are the imidazole derivatives. Starting from a 4,6-disubstituted benzimidazole lead structure, a series of 4,5-biarylimidazoles capable to block both capsaicin and acid-induced calcium influx in TRPV1-expressing Chinese hamster ovary cells. Imidazole (fig. 8a) was identified as a highly potent and orally bioavailable TRPV1.[32] Another class are the diaryl ethers and amines. Compounds from a quinazoline series can be considered as conformationally restricted analogs of a biarylamide series. In terms of activity 5-isoquinoline was found the most active among and ranked in the order of 5-isoquinoline > 8-quinoline > 8-quinazoline > 8-isoquinoline ≥ cinnoline > phthalazine > quinoxaline > 5-quinoline[33] e.g. AMG-517 (fig. 8b), although it lacks any recognizable carbonyl motif it still potently blocks capsaicin, proton, and heat activation of TRPV1 in vitro and shows a good tolerability profile.[34] Also, the clinical candidates from Janssen, Abbott and Merck pharmaceuticals (fig. 8c) having a 5-aminoisoquinoline group as a common feature suggesting that there is a key interaction of this group at the receptor site for TRPV1 antagonist activity.[33]

Current status

[edit]

In November 2009, the FDA approved Qutenza (capsaicin, 8% topical patch) for postherpetic neuralgia.[35]

Clinical trials

[edit]
Figure 9. TRPV1 antagonists in clinical development as of 2009

As of late 2009, available public information suggests that quite a few are in clinical trials. Several biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are developing TRPV1 ligands and the emphasis seems to be on both agonists and antagonists. Although the agonists appear to be further along in clinical development.[1]

Agonists

[edit]

NeurogesX has successfully completed three Phase III clinical studies of Qutenza (NGX-4010) that met studies primary endpoints. Qutenza is a synthetic trans-capsaicin and drug delivery is by a rapid-delivery patch application system[36] NeurogesX plans to launch Qutenza in the United States in the first half of November 2010.[37] Anesiva, another biotechnology company, has completed two Phase III trials of Adlea (ALGRX 4975), an injectable capsaicin. Adlea is promising as a pain reliever[38] and both trials showed that Adlea's safety profile of adverse events, wound healing, and wound sensory function were similar to placebo over the study duration.[39]

Antagonists

[edit]

At least seven orally active TRPV1 antagonist substances have progressed into clinical development and several more are in preclinical development. The ligand GRC-6211, by Eli Lilly and Company-Glenmark is the most advanced and is currently in phase IIb clinical trials. GlaxoSmithKline, Merck-Neurogen, Amgen, and AstraZeneca are all developing TRPV1 antagonist and all are developing substances that have completed phase I trials successfully.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f Gunthorpe MJ, Chizh BA (January 2009). "Clinical development of TRPV1 antagonists: targeting a pivotal point in the pain pathway". Drug Discovery Today. 14 (1–2): 56–67. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.11.005. PMID 19063991.
  2. ^ a b c d Kym PR, Kort ME, Hutchins CW (August 2009). "Analgesic potential of TRPV1 antagonists". Biochemical Pharmacology. 78 (3): 211–6. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2009.02.014. PMID 19481638.
  3. ^ Szallasi A, Blumberg PM (June 1999). "Vanilloid (Capsaicin) receptors and mechanisms". Pharmacological Reviews. 51 (2): 159–212. PMID 10353985.
  4. ^ Immke DC, Gavva NR (October 2006). "The TRPV1 receptor and nociception". Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 17 (5): 582–91. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.09.004. PMID 17196854.
  5. ^ Rami H, Gunthorpe M (2004). "The therapeutic potential of TRPV1 (VR1) antagonists: clinical answers await". Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies. 1: 97–104. doi:10.1016/j.ddstr.2004.08.020.
  6. ^ a b Wong GY, Gavva NR (April 2009). "Therapeutic potential of vanilloid receptor TRPV1 agonists and antagonists as analgesics: Recent advances and setbacks". Brain Research Reviews. 60 (1): 267–77. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.006. PMID 19150372. S2CID 9951052.
  7. ^ a b c Messeguer A, Planells-Cases R, Ferrer-Montiel A (January 2006). "Physiology and pharmacology of the vanilloid receptor". Current Neuropharmacology. 4 (1): 1–15. doi:10.2174/157015906775202995. PMC 2430674. PMID 18615132.
  8. ^ a b Gomtsyan A, Bayburt EK, Schmidt RG, Zheng GZ, Perner RJ, Didomenico S, Koenig JR, Turner S, Jinkerson T, Drizin I, Hannick SM, Macri BS, McDonald HA, Honore P, Wismer CT, Marsh KC, Wetter J, Stewart KD, Oie T, Jarvis MF, Surowy CS, Faltynek CR, Lee CH (February 2005). "Novel transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of pain: structure-activity relationships for ureas with quinoline, isoquinoline, quinazoline, phthalazine, quinoxaline, and cinnoline moieties". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 48 (3): 744–52. doi:10.1021/jm0492958. PMID 15689158.
  9. ^ a b c Suh YG, Oh U (2005). "Activation and activators of TRPV1 and their pharmaceutical implication". Current Pharmaceutical Design. 11 (21): 2687–98. doi:10.2174/1381612054546789. PMID 16101449.
  10. ^ Gunthorpe MJ, Szallasi A (2008). "Peripheral TRPV1 receptors as targets for drug development: new molecules and mechanisms". Current Pharmaceutical Design. 14 (1): 32–41. doi:10.2174/138161208783330754. PMID 18220816.
  11. ^ Pearce LV, Petukhov PA, Szabo T, Kedei N, Bizik F, Kozikowski AP, Blumberg PM (August 2004). "Evodiamine functions as an agonist for the vanilloid receptor TRPV1". Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2 (16): 2281–6. doi:10.1039/b404506h. PMID 15305207.
  12. ^ Morita A, Iwasaki Y, Kobata K, Iida T, Higashi T, Oda K, Suzuki A, Narukawa M, Sasakuma S, Yokogoshi H, Yazawa S, Tominaga M, Watanabe T (November 2006). "Lipophilicity of capsaicinoids and capsinoids influences the multiple activation process of rat TRPV1". Life Sciences. 79 (24): 2303–10. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2006.07.024. PMID 16950406.
  13. ^ Vriens J, Appendino G, Nilius B (June 2009). "Pharmacology of vanilloid transient receptor potential cation channels". Molecular Pharmacology. 75 (6): 1262–79. doi:10.1124/mol.109.055624. PMID 19297520. S2CID 52863171.
  14. ^ Suh YG, Lee YS, Min KH, Park OH, Kim JK, Seung HS, Seo SY, Lee BY, Nam YH, Lee KO, Kim HD, Park HG, Lee J, Oh U, Lim JO, Kang SU, Kil MJ, Koo JY, Shin SS, Joo YH, Kim JK, Jeong YS, Kim SY, Park YH (September 2005). "Novel potent antagonists of transient receptor potential channel, vanilloid subfamily member 1: structure-activity relationship of 1,3-diarylalkyl thioureas possessing new vanilloid equivalents". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 48 (18): 5823–36. doi:10.1021/jm0502790. PMID 16134949.
  15. ^ Szallasi A, Appendino G (May 2004). "Vanilloid receptor TRPV1 antagonists as the next generation of painkillers. Are we putting the cart before the horse?". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 47 (11): 2717–23. doi:10.1021/jm030560j. PMID 15139748.
  16. ^ Tominaga M, Caterina MJ, Malmberg AB, Rosen TA, Gilbert H, Skinner K, Raumann BE, Basbaum AI, Julius D (September 1998). "The cloned capsaicin receptor integrates multiple pain-producing stimuli". Neuron. 21 (3): 531–43. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80564-4. PMID 9768840. S2CID 2054891.
  17. ^ Walker KM, Urban L, Medhurst SJ, Patel S, Panesar M, Fox AJ, McIntyre P (January 2003). "The VR1 antagonist capsazepine reverses mechanical hyperalgesia in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain". The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 304 (1): 56–62. doi:10.1124/jpet.102.042010. PMID 12490575. S2CID 14847633.
  18. ^ Lee J, Lee J, Kang M, Shin M, Kim JM, Kang SU, Lim JO, Choi HK, Suh YG, Park HG, Oh U, Kim HD, Park YH, Ha HJ, Kim YH, Toth A, Wang Y, Tran R, Pearce LV, Lundberg DJ, Blumberg PM (July 2003). "N-(3-acyloxy-2-benzylpropyl)-N'-[4-(methylsulfonylamino)benzyl]thiourea analogues: novel potent and high affinity antagonists and partial antagonists of the vanilloid receptor". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 46 (14): 3116–26. doi:10.1021/jm030089u. PMID 12825950.
  19. ^ Lee J, Kang SU, Kil MJ, Shin M, Lim JO, Choi HK, Jin MK, Kim SY, Kim SE, Lee YS, Min KH, Kim YH, Ha HJ, Tran R, Welter JD, Wang Y, Szabo T, Pearce LV, Lundberg DJ, Toth A, Pavlyukovets VA, Morgan MA, Blumberg PM (September 2005). "Analysis of structure-activity relationships for the 'A-region' of N-(4-t-butylbenzyl)-N'-[4-(methylsulfonylamino)benzyl]thiourea analogues as TRPV1 antagonists". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 15 (18): 4136–42. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.009. PMID 16005215.
  20. ^ Wang Y, Szabo T, Welter JD, Toth A, Tran R, Lee J, Kang SU, Suh YG, Blumberg PM, Lee J (October 2002). "High affinity antagonists of the vanilloid receptor". Molecular Pharmacology. 62 (4): 947–56. doi:10.1124/mol.62.4.947. PMID 12237342. S2CID 43833525.
  21. ^ Appendino G, De Petrocellis L, Trevisani M, Minassi A, Daddario N, Moriello AS, Gazzieri D, Ligresti A, Campi B, Fontana G, Pinna C, Geppetti P, Di Marzo V (February 2005). "Development of the first ultra-potent "capsaicinoid" agonist at transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) channels and its therapeutic potential". The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 312 (2): 561–70. doi:10.1124/jpet.104.074864. PMID 15356216. S2CID 816699.
  22. ^ Pomonis JD, Harrison JE, Mark L, Bristol DR, Valenzano KJ, Walker K (July 2003). "N-(4-Tertiarybutylphenyl)-4-(3-cholorphyridin-2-yl)tetrahydropyrazine -1(2H)-carbox-amide (BCTC), a novel, orally effective vanilloid receptor 1 antagonist with analgesic properties: II. in vivo characterization in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain". The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 306 (1): 387–93. doi:10.1124/jpet.102.046268. PMID 12721336. S2CID 11111018.
  23. ^ McDonald HA, Neelands TR, Kort M, Han P, Vos MH, Faltynek CR, Moreland RB, Puttfarcken PS (October 2008). "Characterization of A-425619 at native TRPV1 receptors: a comparison between dorsal root ganglia and trigeminal ganglia". European Journal of Pharmacology. 596 (1–3): 62–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.07.063. PMID 18755179.
  24. ^ Surowy CS, Neelands TR, Bianchi BR, McGaraughty S, El Kouhen R, Han P, Chu KL, McDonald HA, Vos M, Niforatos W, Bayburt EK, Gomtsyan A, Lee CH, Honore P, Sullivan JP, Jarvis MF, Faltynek CR (September 2008). "(R)-(5-tert-butyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-yl)-3-(1H-indazol-4-yl)-urea (ABT-102) blocks polymodal activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptors in vitro and heat-evoked firing of spinal dorsal horn neurons in vivo". The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 326 (3): 879–88. doi:10.1124/jpet.108.138511. PMID 18515644. S2CID 2042292.
  25. ^ Gunthorpe MJ, Rami HK, Jerman JC, Smart D, Gill CH, Soffin EM, Luis Hannan S, Lappin SC, Egerton J, Smith GD, Worby A, Howett L, Owen D, Nasir S, Davies CH, Thompson M, Wyman PA, Randall AD, Davis JB (January 2004). "Identification and characterisation of SB-366791, a potent and selective vanilloid receptor (VR1/TRPV1) antagonist". Neuropharmacology. 46 (1): 133–49. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00305-8. PMID 14654105. S2CID 21048603.
  26. ^ Patwardhan AM, Jeske NA, Price TJ, Gamper N, Akopian AN, Hargreaves KM (July 2006). "The cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 inhibits transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) and evokes peripheral antihyperalgesia via calcineurin". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (30): 11393–8. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10311393P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0603861103. PMC 1544096. PMID 16849427.
  27. ^ Doherty EM, Fotsch C, Bo Y, Chakrabarti PP, Chen N, Gavva N, Han N, Kelly MG, Kincaid J, Klionsky L, Liu Q, Ognyanov VI, Tamir R, Wang X, Zhu J, Norman MH, Treanor JJ (January 2005). "Discovery of potent, orally available vanilloid receptor-1 antagonists. Structure-activity relationship of N-aryl cinnamides". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 48 (1): 71–90. doi:10.1021/jm049485i. PMID 15634002.
  28. ^ Wu C, Gavva NR, Brennan TJ (June 2008). "Effect of AMG0347, a transient receptor potential type V1 receptor antagonist, and morphine on pain behavior after plantar incision". Anesthesiology. 108 (6): 1100–8. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817302b3. PMID 18497612.
  29. ^ a b Westaway SM, Brown SL, Conway E, Heightman TD, Johnson CN, Lapsley K, Macdonald GJ, MacPherson DT, Mitchell DJ, Myatt JW, Seal JT, Stanway SJ, Stemp G, Thompson M, Celestini P, Colombo A, Consonni A, Gagliardi S, Riccaboni M, Ronzoni S, Briggs MA, Matthews KL, Stevens AJ, Bolton VJ, Boyfield I, Jarvie EM, Stratton SC, Sanger GJ (December 2008). "The discovery of biaryl carboxamides as novel small molecule agonists of the motilin receptor". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 18 (24): 6429–36. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.10.072. PMID 19006669.
  30. ^ Westaway SM, Chung YK, Davis JB, Holland V, Jerman JC, Medhurst SJ, Rami HK, Stemp G, Stevens AJ, Thompson M, Winborn KY, Wright J (September 2006). "N-Tetrahydroquinolinyl, N-quinolinyl and N-isoquinolinyl biaryl carboxamides as antagonists of TRPV1". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 16 (17): 4533–6. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.06.026. PMID 16806913.
  31. ^ Brown BS, Keddy R, Zheng GZ, Schmidt RG, Koenig JR, McDonald HA, Bianchi BR, Honore P, Jarvis MF, Surowy CS, Polakowski JS, Marsh KC, Faltynek CR, Lee CH (September 2008). "Tetrahydropyridine-4-carboxamides as novel, potent transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonists". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 16 (18): 8516–25. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.08.005. PMID 18722778.
  32. ^ Gore VK, Ma VV, Tamir R, Gavva NR, Treanor JJ, Norman MH (November 2007). "Structure-activity relationship (SAR) investigations of substituted imidazole analogs as TRPV1 antagonists". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 17 (21): 5825–30. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.08.044. PMID 17851073.
  33. ^ a b Blum CA, Zheng X, Brielmann H, Hodgetts KJ, Bakthavatchalam R, Chandrasekhar J, Krause JE, Cortright D, Matson D, Crandall M, Ngo CK, Fung L, Day M, Kershaw M, De Lombaert S, Chenard BL (August 2008). "Aminoquinazolines as TRPV1 antagonists: modulation of drug-like properties through the exploration of 2-position substitution". Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 18 (16): 4573–7. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.07.036. PMID 18662872.
  34. ^ Gavva NR, Bannon AW, Hovland DN, Lehto SG, Klionsky L, Surapaneni S, Immke DC, Henley C, Arik L, Bak A, Davis J, Ernst N, Hever G, Kuang R, Shi L, Tamir R, Wang J, Wang W, Zajic G, Zhu D, Norman MH, Louis JC, Magal E, Treanor JJ (October 2007). "Repeated administration of vanilloid receptor TRPV1 antagonists attenuates hyperthermia elicited by TRPV1 blockade". The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 323 (1): 128–37. doi:10.1124/jpet.107.125674. PMID 17652633. S2CID 8085707.
  35. ^ "FDA Approves New Drug Treatment for Long-Term Pain Relief after Shingles Attacks". www.fda.gov. Archived from the original on 2009-11-18.
  36. ^ "Qutenza (NGX-4010): Beyond Conventional Pain Therapy". NeurogesX. Archived from the original on 2009-08-30. Retrieved 2009-10-20.
  37. ^ "NeurogesX Announces New PDUFA Date for Qutenza(TM) New Drug Application". Archived from the original on 2009-11-12. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
  38. ^ Aids T (2009). "Capsaicin: Risks and Benefits". US Pharm. 7: 20.
  39. ^ http://www.anesiva.com Archived March 6, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Discovery_and_development_of_TRPV1_antagonists&oldid=1259105284"