Category talk:Fictional adoptees

This category was nominated for deletion on 20 September 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement (inactive)

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacementWikipedia:WikiProject Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacementTemplate:WikiProject Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacementAdoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement

Adoptive parents

Should there be a corresponding category at Category:Fictional adoptive parents? While it seems almost obvious, I think there might be far fewer characters to include. The only examples I can think of offhand are Ma and Pa Kent of Superman and Mr. Bennet of Heroes. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 10:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As categories for fictional parents have been deleted, I think the same would happen for adoptive parents. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's the same situation. Fictional parent categories would be overpopulated because they're very broad. Fictional adoptive parents is a much narrower, more specific category, much like this one. If the fact that someone is adopted merits a category, I think the fact that they have adopted does, too. Doubly so, in fact, because while adoption is a common enough backstory for characters, most fictional characters have biological children (I'd say even the vast majority). LeaHazel : talk : contribs 23:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]