This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This category is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This category is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
With all due respect, I am not sure if we need such highly specialized categories, especially when Wikipedia still has a puzzlingly generic "West Semitic deities" one with no real concern for culture or time period (late deities from Palmyra have little to do with Ugarit or Emar) - surely instead trying to come up with more sensible generic categories for deities worshiped in Syria, Lebanon etc. in antiquity would make more sense, there has to be a middle ground between the current situation and every deity having their own category. Plus how many articles are there which one could viably fit into an Anat category? Anat herself, the city named after her, presently nonexistent pages of rulers of Suhum who restored her temple there? If there at least were multiple works of art depicting Anat famous enough to warrant own pages I would consider it justified, but there's only a handful of certain depictions and most of them, to put it very lightly, are a curiosity even for experts and hardly warrant own pages. I feel like if the person who quadrupled the size of the article is uncertain if its subject is really a big enough of a deal for own category, something might be up. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 08:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Plus how many articles are there which one could viably fit into an Anat category? Anat herself, the city named after her, presently nonexistent pages of rulers of Suhum who restored her temple there?" I sincerely doubt that. We have articles on "sons" and "daughters" of Anat mentioned in ancient sources, a large number of toponyms associated with Anat, several places of worship, inscriptions and poems about Anat, a 1960s books theorizing that she was part of the Israelite pantheon, and modern depictions in Japanese fiction. We have more articles on Anat than Yahweh. Dimadick (talk) 11:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair, I guess, you made your case with the quick addition to a large selection of pages, even if some of the connections strike me as vague. The book is long out of date, though, since the Israelite evidence for widespread worship of Anat is not materializing, it should be noted. I think the whole theory was one of the many products of the presumption that Ugaritic evidence can be easily combined with the Bible, which to be fair were all the field of Ugaritic studies was for its first few decades. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 11:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the details of Acteon's fate vary between versions I would be reluctant to make this sort of statement myself - especially in the light of the actually attested meeting between Greek and Levantine tradition resulting in Athena, rather than Artemis, being recognized as Anat-like (see the discussion of evidence of Cyprus in the article, plus proposals regarding Philo of Byblos), but good job. I actually missed these two in the category, honest mistake on my part.
Also, Ashtart/Astarte already had a category (also created by you, I didn't even realize), so in retrospect you were arguably fully justified all along considering their comparable prominence in antiquity. Sorry if the first message sounded like an attack, no hostility was meant. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 11:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had in the past contemplated whether a category on Anat was viable, but the main article was a mess. I had already noted the repeated reference to Anat in Biblical articles, because I often work on them. What surprised me on your expanded version of the article was Anat depicted as a maiden goddess of hunting, armed with a bow, and having similarities to Potnia Theron (Lady of Animals). Which is typically seen as a Mycenaean version of Artemis. Sometimes I forget how interconnected were the cultures of the East Mediterranean. Dimadick (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]