Category:Wikipedia essays
![]() | This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. |
This category contains Wikipedia essays – project pages on Wikipedia-related topics, but with no official status.
Pages tagged with {{essay}}
categorize here if they are in the Wikipedia namespace and into Category:User essays if they are in userspace. Please use more specific templates where appropriate:
{{Behavioral essay}}
{{Civility essay}}
{{Deletion essay}}
{{Humorous essay}}
{{Information page}}
{{Notability essay}}
{{Template essay}}
{{Supplemental essay}}
{{WikiProject advice}}
Essays in the Wikipedia namespace may be edited by anyone. Essays in the User namespace are normally edited only by the user that hosts the page and are categorized with Category:User essays, usually via {{user essay}}. User essays may be moved categorically into the Wikipedia namespace and this category if they are frequently referenced, as evidenced by becoming an evolving expression of multiple editors. Wikipedia essays may be moved into userspace (or deleted) if they are found to be unhelpful or to contradict a settled point of policy. Additional essays may be found in the WMF-wide meta:Category:Essays. For non-Wikipedia-related essays, as article topics, see Category:Essays.
Subcategories
This category has the following 15 subcategories, out of 49 total.
(previous page) (next page)N
O
P
R
S
- Wikipedia essays about stubs (6 P)
T
V
- Wikipedia essays about vandalism (21 P)
W
- Wikipedia warning essays (28 P)
- Essays about what Wikipedia is (15 P)
- Wikipedia supplemental pages (141 P)
Pages in category "Wikipedia essays"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 2,107 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)N
- Wikipedia:No angry mastodons
- Wikipedia:No angry mastodons just madmen
- Wikipedia:No attacks on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:No blurry images
- Wikipedia:No cite-by date
- Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
- Wikipedia:No Confederates
- User:JPxG/All essays by size/Transcluded
- Wikipedia:No excessive literalism
- Wikipedia:No fixed rules
- Wikipedia:No get out of jail free cards
- Wikipedia:No holy wars
- Wikipedia:No it's fixed
- Wikipedia:No matter what it's their talk page
- Wikipedia:No Moral Code
- Wikipedia:No Nazis
- Wikipedia:No offense intended
- Wikipedia:No one will listen to reason when their back is up
- Wikipedia:No original biographies
- Wikipedia:No pet peeve wars
- Wikipedia:No pre-close summaries, please
- Wikipedia:No queerphobia
- Wikipedia:No racists
- Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article
- Wikipedia:No screaming
- Wikipedia:No slack
- Wikipedia:No soliciting of cliques
- Wikipedia:No trojan horses
- Wikipedia:No-edit orders
- Wikipedia:No-no
- Wikipedia:No. Wikipedia is NOT biased
- Wikipedia:Nobody cares
- Wikipedia:Nominating good articles
- Wikipedia:Nominating multiple articles for deletion in a day
- Wikipedia:Non serviam
- Wikipedia:Non-admin closure
- Wikipedia:Non-breaking hyphen
- Wikipedia:Non-deleting deletion discussions
- Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria (Human Readable Version)
- Wikipedia:Non-free content/FAQ
- Wikipedia:Non-sysop closures
- Wikipedia:Not a barbarian horde
- Wikipedia:Not a new editor
- Wikipedia:Not all sources are created equal
- Wikipedia:Not Colosseum
- Wikipedia:Not compatible with a collaborative project
- Wikipedia:Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction
- Wikipedia:Not every article can be a Featured Article
- Wikipedia:Not every IP is a vandal
- Wikipedia:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
- Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox
- Wikipedia:Not everything needs a template
- Wikipedia:Not everything needs a WikiProject
- Wikipedia:Not in my encyclopedia
- Wikipedia:Not Omniscient
- Wikipedia:Not quite yet
- Wikipedia:Not ready for primetime
- Wikipedia:Not so arbitrary breaks
- Wikipedia:Notability (awards and honors)
- Wikipedia:Notability (cryptocurrencies)
- Wikipedia:Notability (earthquakes)
- Wikipedia:Notability (video game characters)
- Wikipedia:Notability and its Discontents
- Wikipedia:Notability explained
- Wikipedia:Notability of reliable sources
- Wikipedia:Notability points
- Wikipedia:Notability vs. prominence
- Wikipedia:Notable person survival kit
- Wikipedia:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page
- Wikipedia:Noted not notable
- Wikipedia:NOTFOOD
- Wikipedia:Nothing is clear
- Wikipedia:Nothing is in stone
- Wikipedia:Notification
- Wikipedia:NPOV deletion
- Wikipedia:NPOV in userboxes
- Wikipedia:NPOV means neutral editing, not neutral content
O
- Wikipedia:Obituaries as sources
- Wikipedia:Obscure Guideline 573
- Wikipedia:Obtain peer review comments
- Wikipedia:Obversion
- Wikipedia:Obvious sock is obvious
- Wikipedia:Obvious vandalism
- Wikipedia:Off-wiki policy discussion
- Wikipedia:Offensive speech
- Wikipedia:Offline sources
- Wikipedia:Oh, Well
- Wikipedia:Old dogs and new tricks
- Wikipedia:Old IP talk pages
- Wikipedia:Old news
- Wikipedia:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
- Wikipedia:Om nom nom nom
- Wikipedia:OMGNUDEHUMANBODIES
- Wikipedia:On assuming good faith
- Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion
- Wikipedia:Once is enough
- Wikipedia:One hundred words
- Wikipedia:One last chance
- Wikipedia:One reason for notability
- Wikipedia:One sentence does not an article make
- Wikipedia:Only Martians should edit
- Wikipedia:Opening up a can of worms
- Wikipedia:Opinions are like arseholes
- Wikipedia:Oral history
- Wikipedia:Other duck
- Wikipedia:Othering
- Wikipedia:OTHERLANGUAGEEXISTS
- Wikipedia:Otto Middleton (or why newspapers are dubious sources)
- Wikipedia:Our social policies are not a suicide pact
- Wikipedia:Out of scope
- Wikipedia:Outing (essay)
- Wikipedia:Over-explanation
- Wikipedia:Over-hasty Speedy Deleters
- Wikipedia:Overcategorization/Intersection of location and occupation
- Wikipedia:Overlink crisis
- Wikipedia:Overlistification
- Wikipedia:Overquoting
- Wikipedia:Overreacting
- Wikipedia:Oversimplification
P
- Wikipedia:Pack's law of devolution
- Wikipedia:Page Reformat Crisis
- Wikipedia:Pages with neutrality problems
- Wikipedia:Pageviews and primary topics
- Wikipedia:Paid editing (essay)
- Wikipedia:Paid editor's bill of rights
- Wikipedia:Paid operatives
- Wikipedia:Pantomime
- Wikipedia:Paradoxes
- Wikipedia:Partisanship
- Wikipedia:Pay actions forward
- User:Pelagic/Incubator/Essay – Why I still use desktop view instead of mobile
- Wikipedia:Pencils are no big deal
- Wikipedia:Pending changes caveats
- Wikipedia:Perfecting articles
- Wikipedia:Perfectionism is bad
- Wikipedia:Permastub
- Wikipedia:Persons known for one higher profile event
- Wikipedia:Petitions are considered harmful
- Wikipedia:Petitions are considered non-harmful
- Wikipedia:Pharmanoia
- Wikipedia:Photograph your hometown
- Wikipedia:Pick one
- Wikipedia:Pictures for medical articles
- Wikipedia:Ping pong
- Wikipedia:Pinocchio
- Wikipedia:Pioneers
- Wikipedia:Plagiarism of Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Planespotters.net
- Wikipedia:Please discuss on talk page first
- Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers is not a suicide pact
- Wikipedia:Please don't edit the (SPI) archives
- Wikipedia:Please don't shout
- Wikipedia:Please say please
- Wikipedia:Please use fullurl
- Wikipedia:Please use spellcheck
- Wikipedia:Pledges
- Wikipedia:Plural of antenna
- Wikipedia:Plus-one
- Wikipedia:Pocket consensus
- Wikipedia:Point of view dispute
- Wikipedia:Points to note while debating in WikiProject India related AFDs
- Wikipedia:Pokémon test
- Wikipedia:Polarity
- Wikipedia:Policy doesn't override logic
- Wikipedia:Policy drift
- Wikipedia:Policy sculpting: inclusion versus exclusion
- Wikipedia:Policy shopping
- Wikipedia:Political achievements
- Wikipedia:Political dispute
- Wikipedia:Political positions
- Wikipedia:Politics
- Wikipedia:Pornography
- Wikipedia:Positive feedback
- Wikipedia:Positivity
- Wikipedia:Post-expand include size
- Wikipedia:Postulate absence of malice
- Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources
- Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources/Books that plagiarize Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
- Wikipedia:POV Cleanup
- Wikipedia:POV creep
- Wikipedia:POV railroad
- Wikipedia:PR Professionals & Editing
- Wikipedia:Precedents
- Wikipedia:Precocious editing
- Wikipedia:Presentation
- Wikipedia:Presentations
- Wikipedia:Presentism
- Wikipedia:Prices
- Wikipedia:Primary and secondary source paradoxes in law-related articles
- Wikipedia:Primary topics in WP:ONEOTHER situations
- Wikipedia:Primary topics with respect to usage
- Wikipedia:Prime objective
- Wikipedia:Printability
- Wikipedia:Privacy of affiliation
- Wikipedia:Procedurally flawed consensus
- Wikipedia:Practical process
- Wikipedia:Process is important
- Wikipedia:Processes
- Wikipedia:Prodigy