Jump to content

Graph (abstract data type): Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 October 2024

30 July 2024

19 July 2024

18 June 2024

28 May 2024

10 November 2023

16 October 2023

10 October 2023

15 September 2023

6 September 2023

1 September 2023

27 April 2023

26 April 2023

24 April 2023

2 January 2023

12 December 2022

5 July 2022

9 June 2022

2 March 2022

6 February 2022

30 January 2022

27 January 2022

8 January 2022

29 October 2021

  • curprev 05:4405:44, 29 October 2021 David Eppstein talk contribs 13,396 bytes +1 User:Jason Quinn your edit summary was tendentious and uncivil, a pointless "further reading" link is not a reference, and a citation template is a different thing than a citation style. But I acknowledge that as of the 2012 edit the CLRS reference was in something like CS1. Also, your recent edits did NOT leave the article in a consistent style. undo
  • curprev 01:1901:19, 29 October 2021 Jason Quinn talk contribs 13,395 bytes +39 Undid rev 1052341655 by David Eppstein (talk). False. The first usage of cite templates was by Cybercobra on 01:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC), which you removed on 22:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC), leaving the article with no cite templates; but as per WP:CITEVAR CS style was now established The last time you found a consistent style should have been 04:16, 28 October 2021‎, which is my edit and you only had to go back 2 hours for that. undo Tag: Undo

28 October 2021

27 October 2021

10 September 2021

25 June 2021

8 June 2021

28 April 2021

27 April 2021

4 April 2021

30 March 2021

28 March 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)