Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Warsaw Ghetto Josef Bloesche.jpg
Appearance
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/59/Stroop_Report_-_Warsaw_Ghetto_Uprising_06.jpg/220px-Stroop_Report_-_Warsaw_Ghetto_Uprising_06.jpg)
The image speaks for itself.
- Nominate and support. - Vircabutar 04:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Support Wow, that's just pitiful. The expresssion on the boys face just sums it up so perfectly. Really touching. --Fir0002 09:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Support Olegivvit 10:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Historical significance overweighs any quality issue. --Janke | Talk 12:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Strong Support per Janke -Rangermike 13:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Object – This image is far too small to be a featured picture. Great photo, it's a shame the resolution is so low. ♠ SG →Talk 14:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Strong Support. Very famous image and of great historical significance. Usually, quality is not scrutinized so in images of such age and historical background. -- AJ24 15:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Support edit - captures the moment, perfect - Jack (talk) 16:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Support. Extremely famous image, reminiscent of the girl in Vietnam fleeing the napalm attack. This image is prominently featured in Martin Gilbert's book on the Holocaust. Powerful. Antandrus (talk) 16:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I assume you mean Image:TrangBang.jpg. That image is amazing, why is it copyrighted? Surely it was taken by the US military and is therefor PD? Seems such a loss, it would be a great addition to historical FAs - Jack (talk) 17:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- It was not taken by a U.S. government employee. It was taken by a press photographer, IIRC, and is copyrighted. -- Moondigger 18:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nick Ut, AP. If it had been taken by an US soldier it would probably have ended in the trash can. Ericd 20:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I assume you mean Image:TrangBang.jpg. That image is amazing, why is it copyrighted? Surely it was taken by the US military and is therefor PD? Seems such a loss, it would be a great addition to historical FAs - Jack (talk) 17:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Support. Ericd 20:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support either. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-07-26 19:39
- Oppose edit. Leave it as it is ! What else ? darkening the blown-out highlights and what about a color version ? Ericd 20:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support the original version. TomStar81 21:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. I like the pic, but it is small. I will switch to Support if it can be rescanned to at least 1000px wide. --Billpg 23:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support illustrates portions of the the article well!--Pedit 21:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- User has only 7 edits, 6 of which are on FPC --Fir0002 22:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support either, preference for Edit 1 (if it's given a meaningful filename!). The emotion reaches out and grabs you. --jjron 09:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- filename corrected
Promoted Image:Warsaw Ghetto Josef Bloesche-edit1.jpg Raven4x4x 05:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)