User talk:Wikiality123
| “ | Not that I was a very active editor, but just to let people know that leaving message on my talkpage will hardly mean anything anymore. | ” |
| San Roze | |||||||||||||||||
|
My Wiki Home | 
|
My Talk Page | 
|
All My Contributions | 
|
Drop Me An Email | ||||||||||
state party
[edit]All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam is an state party see List_of_recognised_political_parties_in_India#State. Dpkpm007 (talk) 12:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- The party in question is found in more than one state and hence not just a state party. If you have any queries and concerns about it please post it on either the talk page of the articles or category concerned. The category you added to the article does not exist in the first place. You are free to create one if it is called for. Create a category before you add it to articles. Cheers --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 12:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:EDungan.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:EDungan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- The OTRS for this has apparently not been received, as there was no OTRS ticket number on the image. If it does clear OTRS in the future, an admin with OTRS access will be able to restore the image. Skier Dude (talk 01:10, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- I reckon there should be some kinda back log in this. You might be able to appreciate the fact that it is frustrating to see that after making all the efforts to acquire permission from authorities and uploading them on wikipedia they get easily deleted. Of late this OTRS issue has been putting me off really bad. I honestly don't intend to make this sound rude, but the current system at the OTRS is grossly unfriendly. Anyways, there is nothing more I can do other than forwarding the email again to the OTRS. I reckon that it is now the responsibility of people involved in the whole process to make sure that they are not putting off people from this project by penalising others for the backlogs in their system. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Periyar with Kamaraj.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Periyar with Kamaraj.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 20:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. It is probably better to get this file deleted as the person who released the permission on email at the time of the upload is no longer responding and OTRS is currently requesting more specific wording which the original email does not have. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 08:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:AIADMK Two Leaves.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AIADMK Two Leaves.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 15:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please refer to an earlier discussion on this issue. Cheers --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 08:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Tamil Wiki Media Contest
[edit]Tamil Wiki Media Contest
|
|---|
 Greetings from the Tamil Wiki Community,
We invite you all to participate in the contest. Please spread the word among your friends and share our Facebook page: |
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Dravidian parties
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Template:Dravidian parties requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 10:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 10:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 10:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I hope this can end. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Basilica
[edit]The article Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health looks great. I haven't read it's entirety yet, but the overall quality is much higher than what had made it into the Velankanni article. Some vanity is merited : ) Doc Tropics 16:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks mate. Much appreciated. :D --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 16:30, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
I hope you are not a terrorist online
[edit]I hope you are not a terrorist online? Do not indulge in edit war. Avoid section blanking. discuss before you proceed to do so.118.102.167.83 (talk) 09:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Anyone who wants to fix Velankanni article is a terrorist, is it? lol --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Discussion on the topic is on the talk page and it is you who is not ready to discuss. --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Wikiality123, please keep in mind that, while this edit is edit warring, and has a myriad of issues, it is not considered vandalism by Wikipedia's definition. Doing so marks your edit as a minor edit, which are not used to add or remove content, especially in a content dispute such as this. Thank you. - SudoGhost 09:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. Its good to know for the future. Cheers --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 10:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Wikiality123, please keep in mind that, while this edit is edit warring, and has a myriad of issues, it is not considered vandalism by Wikipedia's definition. Doing so marks your edit as a minor edit, which are not used to add or remove content, especially in a content dispute such as this. Thank you. - SudoGhost 09:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Discussion on the topic is on the talk page and it is you who is not ready to discuss. --Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Streptomyces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Template:Cite doi/10.1101.2F087969172.16.89 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit] |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom
High Beam Research
[edit]HighBeam Research is an online, paid search engine for newspapers, magazines, academic journals, newswires, trade magazines and encyclopedias. The site has access to over 80 million articles from 6,500 publications, most of which are not available for free elsewhere on the internet. Thousands of new articles are added daily, archives date back over 25 years including trade journal, newspaper articles, and peer-reviewed journals covering a wide range of subjects and industries; and there are tools for finding, saving, organizing, and sharing information as documents. Aside from a free 7-day trial (credit card required), access to HighBeam costs $30 per month or $200 per year for the first year and $300 for subsequent years.
As of March 13, 2012 HighBeam has generously agreed to give free, full-access 1-year accounts for Wikipedia editors to use, at the discretion of the community. HighBeam is excited about this and does not expect there to be a shortage of these free, 1-year accounts; however, editors will have to have a 1 year-old account and 1000 edits in order to qualify for one. At the end of 1 year, editors who found the resource useful can simply re-apply.
I'd really like it if you applied for this:
Wikipedia:HighBeam/Applications
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Dead link in article 'Streptomyces griseus'
[edit]Hi. The article 'Streptomyces griseus' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?
Dead: http://park.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/hakko/genome/
- You added this in December 2008.
- The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.
This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!
PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots|deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page.
BlevintronBot (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Images copied from wikipedia are deleted for being copied and used by some other sites
[edit]Hi, A few images which are copied from wikipedia are being used by ervadi.com. In april 2010 you added 'cfd' for those files since they had a message copyright. You asked ( check here )me to warn them, and i wrote an e-mail to them asking them to remove copyright from their site. and they have immediately removed copyright symbol. Now another user has deleted a file "thiruparankundram_dargah.jpg" for being used in the same site ervadi.com. They have never claimed copyright sinc they agreed they took it from wikipeida. Kindly chekc this and revert the file. thanks. Wasif (talk) 08:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Waiting for your reply. Can you please look into this? Wasif (talk) 08:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jaya Group logo.jpg
[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Maraimalai Adigal.JPG listed for discussion
[edit]
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Wikiality123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Colors
[edit]I saw your Semi-retired flag and statements, but I thought you might be interested in this long-overdue addition in reference to a question you asked, Wikipedialistically summarized here. --Thnidu (talk) 08:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DP-genealogy
[edit]
Template:DP-genealogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Wikiality123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Dravida Munetra Kazhagam (rising sun).png listed for discussion
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:Chennai Police logo.gif
[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamil Nadu/Participants list.
[edit]Hi Wikiality123! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamil Nadu/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamil Nadu/Participants.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DP-genealogy
[edit]Template:DP-genealogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 12:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Please take a moment to update your signature
[edit]Hi there! I noticed when you contributed to a TFD page that your signature needs a minor syntax update so that it does not add deprecated tags and syntax to discussion pages. Please see this edit; your new signature format should look like this:
<b>[[User:Wikiality123|<span style="color:Orange;">Wiki San Roze</span>]]</b><sup><i> [[User talk:Wikiality123|<span style="color:green">†αLҝ</span>]]</i></sup>
Thanks for taking a moment to update it at Special:Preferences. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing cites in C. R. formula
[edit]Back in 2009, you created the article with three short citations that are not listed in the bibliography: "Wolpert", "Agrawal", and "Jayapalan". Is it possible to add the full citations? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata•3 03:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam flag.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam flag.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam top.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam top.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:DP-genealogy
[edit]Template:DP-genealogy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)