Wikipedia talk:WikiCup

This is the talk page for the WikiCup, for asking questions about the contest. edit header

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Got a query? Check to see if it is answered in the FAQ or in a previous discussion using the search box below.

Submission pages list (how?)
User list

Archives:

Archives
2009: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11
2010: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11
2011: 1 / 2 / 3
2012: 1 / 2
2013: 1 / 3 / 4
2014: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
2015: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6
2016: 1 / 2 / 3
2017: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
2018: 1
2019: 1 / 2
2020: 1 / 2
2021: 1 / 2 / 3
2022: 1 / 2 / 3
2023: 1 / 2
2024: 1 / 2 / 3
2025: 1

WikiCup content needing review
view • edit

Featured content

Featured/good topic candidates

DYK

Hard Out Here (Raye song) (DYK)
Maria Einsmann (only needs ALT approved)
Johann Reinhold Forster
Semiaquilegia adoxoides (there are 8 articles here)

GAN

Sound Transit (start)
Darryl De Sousa (start)
Gary Tuggle (nom)
Maria Einsmann (start)
The Voices of Morebath (start)
Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around (start)
Alina Zagitova (start)
I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love (start)
Headfirst for Halos (start)
Abraham Weintraub–Wikipedia controversy (start)
Demolition Lovers (start)

PR

A few days left...

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived until 20:25, 5 November 2025 (UTC).

As we approach the beginning of the wikicup 2025 I wish to bring attention to a few useful tools for the contest.

Wikipedia:Good article review circles You get a review and review another in exchange, a very simple way to get atleast 40 points.
Wikipedia:Former featured and good topics Picking up a topic and restoring it shouldn't take too long depending on what you pick.
Wikipedia:Reward board Provides other incentives to produce quality content

While most May find this redundant I hope atleast one person benefits from any of these. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 11:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting these links. I've pinned this section for the duration of the 2025 WikiCup. Epicgenius (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding "rank" to cup table?

I have no idea if this would be a huge pain to implement or not, but since only the top 16 in each round will score Tournament Points, every time I check the leaderboard I find myself trying to count the rows to see how far I am from that threshold. Would it be possible to add a "rank" column to the table? ~ L 🌸 (talk) 01:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LEvalyn, you could use the unofficial WikiCup tool to see if you're currently in the top 16, and how many tournament points you're projected to receive (based on current round-point scores). – Epicgenius (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this is great! Thanks, I hadn't come across this, but it totally accomplishes what I need. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article co-reviewers

If two people were to work together on reviewing a good article, how would the points be allocated there? Would both people get the 5 points if they both put significant work into the review (sort of like how FAC reviews are split up but everyone gets full points), or would only one person be eligible for the points? Interested in hearing feedback from the judges and other participants. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think one would want to be wary of unintended consequences. Five points each, however deserved in an individual case, may encourage joint GAN reviews. That said, if five points each is agreed, I have a recently completed second opinion which ran to more work and words than any of my full GANRs of the past year ... Gog the Mild (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd consider it a plus if it encouraged joint reviews (namely a detailed prose review from one and a detailed source review from the other). It would be an effective way to make GA more lightweight for individual reviewers and limit reviewing burnout. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, both reviewers would be eligible for points, subject to the usual requirement that they provide substantial feedback and review the article against the full criteria. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think our GA process allowed for joint reviews Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: PMC and I have done it before, but it was for a huge article and she was the "primary" reviewer -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 12:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would this be allowed?

Beverly White was promoted to FA status on January 19, 2025, but I submitted it for that on December 1, 2024. Would I be able to include it in my Wikicup submissions? Jon698 (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon698, it was promoted on January 19, so yes, you would be allowed to include it. Articles' eligibility for points is based on promotion date, not nomination date. Epicgenius (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Topic

If I add a good article to a featured topic, would that count as featured topic points or good topic points because its not a featured article? History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: If you go through the formal process of revising the FT to add an article and there is an consensus to add the GA to the FT, you would get 1 FT article worth of points -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 12:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]