Jump to content

Wikipedia:XfD today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:XfD Today)

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.


Speedy deletion candidates

[edit]

Articles

[edit]

Purge server cache

New Year's Evil (Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find sources to satisfy NBOOK after searching on ProQuest, JSTOR, Newspaper Archive, and Google Scholar. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best of Enemies (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have not been able to find enough sources to satisfy NBOOK after searching Google News, Newspaper Archive, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The secondary source on the article does not provide SIGCOV. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery Train (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find enough sources to satisfy WP:NBOOK after searching through Google Scholar, News Archive, JSTOR, and ProQuest, though I found a blog review. The article indicates a Nancy Drew game is based on the book, but I have not found secondary sources to verify this claim [1]. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of college football coaches with 150 NCAA Division I FCS wins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any sources suggesting this grouping meets the WP:LISTN as it is not covered by non-primary sources. Let'srun (talk) 00:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created this page because I believe the NCAA's official career leaderboard for winningest FCS coached doesn't accurately reflect the most successful coaches at that level. (I believe the same issue applies to coaching leaderboards in other divisions.) What we now know as FCS didn't exist before the 1978 season (as I-AA). Before then, the original I-AA programs had either been in an undivided Division I or in Division II. In the early 1980s, a substantial number of conferences and programs were downgraded to I-AA, and movement between the various subdivisions within D-I (mostly from I-AA/FCS to I-A/FBS) and between divisions (most often D-II to FCS) has been pretty much constant. The NCAA defines an "FCS coach" as an individual who served as a head coach for at least 10 years at that level (whether in the I-AA or FCS era), but counts ALL wins credited to that head coach at ALL four-year programs where he served as HC—even if he coached at a program that wasn't in FCS, or at the same program when it was competing at a different level. — Dale Arnett (talk) 06:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lesedi FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about radio station with much unsourced content and lack of independant sources or significant coverage. On inspection one of the three sources appears to fail verification as well. It might be possible that the article could be merged into South African Broadcasting Corporation if, as is claimed in the lead, the station is a subsidiary of that organization, but I cannot find confirmation of this fact. Lenny Marks (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buried in Time (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't found evidence to establish NBOOK after checking for reviews via ProQuest, Google Scholar, JSTOR, and Newspaper Archive. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Last Resort (Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't found evidence to establish NBOOK after checking for reviews via Kirkus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, JSTOR, and Newspaper Archive. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas Rossiter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A before search does not show anything significant for this article. Does not pass GNG or NHOCKEY. Klinetalkcontribs 00:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files

[edit]

Categories

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Redirects

[edit]

You Decide on the Adventure

[edit]

Extremely novel and obscure redirect that is only used in one article as a "not to be confused" item, and is barely mentioned and described in the target article. Definitely deserves to be deleted. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Templates and Modules

[edit]

Orphaned in mainspace, and future use seems unlikely: See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 14#Template:AY-3-8910. Subst and delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a template for every single emoticon under the sun. Subst this template's single use and delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany

[edit]
User:Vlgvlgvlg/Yaël Braun-Pivet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)​

WP:RFORK of Yaël Braun-Pivet. Paradoctor (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

[edit]