Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 April 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 30

[edit]
Image:Hm_pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deankiely999 (notify | contribs).
Image:HoFFaun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by EAFEAF (notify | contribs).
Image:Hoffa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by YungStarr (notify | contribs).
Image:Holloween2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Superwhitetrash (notify | contribs).
Image:Homburg_Saar_in_Germany.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kihosa (notify | contribs).
Image:Home_1x1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Prosody07 (notify | contribs).
Image:Home_Albany_BobRobertMichael.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rseals (notify | contribs).
Image:Homebush_Boys_High_School_Map.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Down2mars (notify | contribs).
Image:Runaway brides cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Recnet (notify | contribs).
Image:Wbmgwin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Knowledgeman800 (notify | contribs).
Image:SmurfsS1V1-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrx9898 (notify | contribs).
  • OB, OP, UE. UE due to the fact it looks like an advertisement and has a "price tag" attached to it. OB, due to the fact that image Smurfsdvd.jpg is of better quality, or at least more encyclopedic and has replaced it. OP due to the fact it is no longer being used anywhere on Wikipedia. Modor (talk) 09:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meh, go for it. Mrx9898 (talk) 03:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rockdale trackplan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Quaidy (notify | contribs).
Image:Barley Mow.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schumi555 (notify | contribs).
Image:MacArthur Airport Police Car.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DanTD (notify | contribs).
  • Image is of poor quality and low resolution. Could be any police car, does not represent the subject well at all.

Also, provides little benefit in the context it is current being used. Nenyedi(DeedsTalk) 17:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took that picture in the late-1990's and that scene is from the Long Island MacArthur Airport. Just because YOU don't recognize it, doesn't mean you can justify trashing it! ----DanTD (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DanTD, no one is saying it isn't what you say it is, only that it doesn't represent what you want it to do very well. I concur with that assessment, BUT just because it isn't a good picture doesn't mean it should just be thrown away, just that this may not be the best place for it. If you want to keep it on Wikipedia, the simple solution is to add it to your user page. No one can delete it then (since it does not violate any copyright laws). You can then argue for its merits of inclusion in the article without it being deleted (of which the police force is never even discussed...why is the picture there exactly? What does it illustrate?). If this is done, then there is no reason to delete this image, IMHO and discussion of its iclusion should be moved to the Long Island MacArthur Airport talk page. — BQZip01 — talk 19:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That seems reasonable enough, but even if I do move it to my userpage, I'm still concerned that it's going to be trashed. As for what it's supposed to illustrate, it was supposed to be loosely tied to the ground crew or general maitenance of the airport itself. The Long Island MacArthur Airport Police is an extension of the Town of Islip Auxillary Police force. ----DanTD (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image kept. No consensus to delete. -Nv8200p talk 00:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Hillary Clinton first lady portraitHRC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evrik (notify | contribs).
More a point of order than an objection, this image is from Commons and needs to be nominated for deletion there, not here. --Bobblehead (rants) 19:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
D'OH! — BQZip01 — talk 19:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moot point. The image has been deleted from the commons. — BQZip01 — talk 05:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MomentsEmersonDriveSingle1.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Caldorwards4 (notify | contribs).
Image:Cardiff distort 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ryan4314 (notify | contribs).
Image:Cardiff distort.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ryan4314 (notify | contribs).


Image:Gustavk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Grandia01 (notify | contribs).
  • Screenshot of a film released by the US Government but this film used material not made by the US govenrment so PD-USGov is not a valid license tag. Tagged by me with a general fairuse tag but uploader - who is known for having some difficulties with understanding image licensing - constantly reverts these changes and fails to change the general tag into a usage-specific fair use tag (not my responsibility to find one and I assume even if I find one the uploader would revert me). Denniss (talk) 21:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
how the u.s government got a hold of that movie is irrelevant to us,all what we know is that it is owned now by the u.s government.for someone like you,i can imagine how simple things like these are hard to comprehendGrandia01 (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just because the work is created by a PD government doesn't mean that it is not a derivative work of an existing non-free work not' created by a PD government. As far as I can tell, the non-government elements are still under copyright. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 03:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"As far as I can tell, the non-government elements are still under copyright." and can you please provide proof of that statement of yours mr genius??thanksGrandia01 (talk) 06:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image kept. The image now has a fair use tag which is correct. Although the U.S. government may not have honored the copyright of the Nazi government then. Wikipedia does honor the inheritor of the copyright (probably the current German government). Image does now need fair use rationale and I have tagged it as such. -Nv8200p talk 00:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]