Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Green Book/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of accolades received by Green Book (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): Sgubaldo (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Green Book follows Frank Vallelonga, who is hired as a chauffeur by Don Shirley for a tour of concert venues in the Deep South. The Sakurai Prize nomination has picked up two supports and passed a source review, so I am adding a second one. Sgubaldo (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source and image review from TheDoctorWho

[edit]

Comments are based off of this revision:

  • List only has two images; one originally uploaded to Flickr under a CC-By license; the other uploaded under CC-0
  • Images have captions and alt text
  • Ref 5: I'm concerned about the reliability of Box Office Mojo considering it's owned and published by WP:IMDb.
    • As far as I'm aware, BOM does not contain user-generated content like the main IMDb. It's also included in WP:FILMSOURCES.
  • Ref 10: Missing a work/website
    • Added.
  • Ref 11: Appears this should be url-access=subscription rather than registration
    • Changed.
  • Ref 12: Missing a work/website
    • Added.
  • Ref 14: Needs url-access=subscription
    • Added.
  • Ref 15: Website needs piped to Salon
    • Sure, changed.
  • Ref 17: WP:NEWSWEEK is unreliable post-2013
    • Replaced with a Vanity Fair one.
  • Ref 31: Missing a work/website
    • Added.
  • Ref 41: Needs an Italian language tag
    • Added.
  • Ref 63: Needs a Japanese language tag
    • Added.
  • Ref 66: Has a listed author that needs added
    • Added.
  • Ref 82: Still has a form of live link just needs swapped out and updated
    • Changed.
  • Ref 90: Dead link
    • Removed url-status=live.
  • Spot checked references 2, 15, 19, 24, 27, 36, 41, 46, 50, 54, 60, 68, 70, 74, 81, 85, 92, 94
    • Ref 2: Doesn't confirm Victor Hugo Green as the author
      • Added another source to back this up.

No major issues here, just a few things to address. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheDoctorWho, done. Sgubaldo (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work, source and image reviews pass! TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

[edit]

This review is based on this version of the article.

  • Ref 39 – Change website to Cinema for Peace awards to match the target
  • Ref 55 – Why is this marked as dead? The page is live and the archived version doesn't show anything that the current one doesn't. The current version just shows more recent nominees as well.
    • I must've just accidentally not put |url-status=live. Not marked as dead anymore.
  • Ref 55 – Should link to Heartland International Film Festival instead
    • Done.
  • Ref 93 – Website listed as "Next Best Picture" whereas refs 45 and 90 use "NextBestPicture". Be consistent.
    • Changed Ref. 93
  • Heartland Film Festival in the table should be Heartland International Film Festival Awards
    • Changed.

With a focus on consistency in reference formatting, that's all I've got. Please ping me when these have been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh, done. Thanks for the review. Sgubaldo (talk) 00:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm not opposed to Cinema for Peace awards being moved, I actually don't have an opinion on it, but I do think we need to match the target. I'll leave whether it should be moved up to you and anybody else involved. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "limited release in 20 cities, in the United States, on" - no need for those commas
  • "However, some also criticised" - American subject so that last word should be spelt with a Z
  • "Ali was further recognised" - same here
  • That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]