Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Siberian accentor/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 13:39, 31 January 2017 [1].

Siberian accentor

Nominator(s): Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Siberian accentor is a drab little bird from the Russian Arctic, and this article is short by necessity because it's so little researched. The unprecedented westward irruption of October 2016 was the catalyst to write this page, especially after I'd joined its admirers in Yorkshire. Thanks to Nikkimaria for advising on the licensing of the NOAA map and vetting the associated reference

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Aa77zz

This article is well prepared and I can find very little to quibble with. Please check that you are happy with the small edits that I've made to the article.

Taxonomy

"is most closely related to the black-throated, brown, Kozlov's, Radde’s and Arabian accentors." I think it would be safer to write: "is most similar in appearance to ..."

I think you should mention the phylogenetic study by Drovetski et al published in 2013. It is an open access article. Very surprisingly (to me) they find that the Siberian accentor is sister to the Japanese accentor (Prunella rubida). This species looks very different as it lacks the pale supercilium, dark crown and eye patch - (click on "Go to the plate of this family" here). The authors state that this relationship is strongly supported by their data (p. 1523) and that these two species are among the four that can be found in lowlands. The full reference is:

Drovetski, SV; Semenov, G; Drovetskaya, SS; Fadeev, IV; Red'kin, YA; Voelker, G (2013). "Geographic mode of speciation in a mountain specialist avian family endemic to the Palearctic". Ecology and Evolution. 3 (6): 1518–1528. doi:10.1002/ece3.539.

I can't find any modern study that looks at the relationship of Prunellidae to other passerine families.

- Aa77zz (talk) 16:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aa77zz thanks for the review and copy edit, it's astonishing what you miss through over-familiarity with the text! I've removed second part of the comment about relationships with other families and added your reference, which, as you say, has quite unexpected conclusions. I've not mentioned the lowland bit, since it's not a relationship indicator, and is open to interpretation. Only the Dunnock is truly a lowland species. Thanks again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - well done. - Aa77zz (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Riley

Looks pretty good so far! I have a few nitpicks:

I think that it would be better to change the "4–6" to "four to six" in "The nest is an open cup in dense shrub or a tree into which the female lays 4–6 glossy deep blue-green eggs that hatch in about ten days."

Done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In "It is therefore evaluated as a species of least concern by the IUCN," IUCN needs to be put in its unabbreviated form, with IUCN in parentheses.

Done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In "The autumn of 2016 saw an unprecedented influx of this species into western Europe, reaching as far as the United Kingdom," the "autumn of the 2016" needs to be changed to something that doesn't include the season, per MOS:SEASON.

Good catch, done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably unlink accentor in the lead, but keep it linked in the taxonomy section.

Yes, that first link is poor Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Supercilium is overlinked.

Done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure that you have some inconsistencies in your usage of oxford commas.

Fixed a couple, feel free to fix any I've missed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the behaviour section, it might be better to either put the second paragraph in the status section or make a predators and parasites section.

Yes, i was uncertain what do do with this, since not really enough for a separate section, moved to status for now

This is just a quick review, I will probably do a more through one soon. Good luck! RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 19:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RileyBugz Many thanks for review and comments Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extra comments:

You missed a period in the taxonomy section, specifically in the description of the nominate subspecies.

Spaces have a place in headings. Particularly the subheading in the movements section.

You should probably changed "2–6" in the sentence "The breeding season of the Siberian accentor is from June to August. Little is known about territorial or breeding behaviour, but birds of the nominate subspecies tend to occur in small groups of 2–6 closely spaced nests," to "two to six".

For consistency, you should probably change "10" in the sentence "The clutch of four to six eggs is incubated by the female for about 10 days to hatching and the downy brown-black chicks are then fed by both parents. They are able to breed in the following year," to "ten". This comment and the previous one are both about the breeding section, just so you can easily find them.

Second paragraph of status, probably need to change "7·4" to "7.4".

Jumping back to the taxonomy section, you need to change the weird apostrophe in "but within that genus the Siberian accentor is most similar in appearance to the black-throated, brown, Kozlov's, Radde’s and Arabian accentors." (in Radde’s specifically).

I also fixed 2 oxford comma mistakes, so check those to make sure they are correct. That is the thorough review, it looks pretty good. RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 16:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RileyBugz, all done. Well spotted with the apostrophe, I don't know how it's possible to do it like that. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reading through it a third time, I forgot to catch one thing, which I am unsure of. The usage of "winter" in the sentence "It is rare in winter in Japan," is dubious. Perhaps "It is rarely seen to winter in Japan," instead? Other wise, I am ready to support. RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 17:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RileyBugz, I'm not sure I get this. Although you were right to comment on seasons earlier, there is nothing wrong with using seasonal terms if attached to a place, eg "winter in Japan" can't possibly be read as referring to the southern hemisphere winter, and your suggestion just moves the seasonal aspect to a verb instead. Changed to "It is only rarely recorded in Japan in winter" (adding "local" or "northern hemisphere") seems redundant). Apologies if I've completely missed the point of your comment. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry about that! You didn't miss the point, anyways. RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 15:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Looks good, all of my nitpicks were addressed. RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 15:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Wehwalt

Interesting article. Just a few things:

"In winter, some seeds may be consumed and the accentors may then sometimes feed near human habitation." the word "then" leads to some ambiguity. I might say "In winter, the accentors may also consume seeds or feed near human habitation."

Done as suggested Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You refer to the incursion being in October and November in the lede, but only October in the body.

Fixed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"sometimes cold environment" "sometimes cold seems kind for Siberia.

yes, but they aren't there in the winter, so that's probably appropriate for May when they return Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Seeds are be consumed in winter," some slight problem here

Ugh, done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Estimates for the small European part of the range vary from 100–500 breeding pairs, with up to 10,000 breeding pairs in Russia" This is confusing. Is European Russia meant? Or the whole of Russia?

The source isn't totally unambiguous, but I think it means the whole of Russia. In practice, these figures are very approximate anyway, so it doesn't make much odds Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I might move the tick image down to the final section, were there is room for it and where you talk about it.

The text started higher on the page, forgot to move image when I moved text, done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it usual in these articles to mention lifespan or the amount of time it takes for the young to reach maturity?--Wehwalt (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Songbirds are invariably mature after the first year, so it's easy to omit to actually say that, done. Average lifespan, like so much regarding this species, appears to be unknown. Scientists appear strangely reluctant to investigate species breeding in the mosquito- and horse-fly-infested forests of Siberia :( Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wehwalt, many thanks for review Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Query by WereSpielChequers

A breeding range of 2.2 million square km and a breeding density of 5pairs per square KM would imply a population in the region of 10 million pairs rather than 10,000. Since the bird is of least concern I would be surprised if there were as few as 10,000 pairs. Ϣere SpielChequers 06:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ϣere, good point. Looking again, the IUCN's ref for this was a table in the back of Mark Brazil's Birds of East Asia (see my reflist), but that only gives a rough estimate for the part of eastern Russia covered by that book. Brazil says his table is based on "published sources" but gives no further info. Population estimates for these Siberian species are always going to be a bit "think of a number, any number" but IUCN have misused Brazil's data, which is in itself dubious. I've removed the estimate, other than the not-unreasonable figure for the small European range. "Large" seems adequate for the total Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. No other questions. Prose is fine. Ϣere SpielChequers 22:48, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

The licensing and sources of the images look good. But I see the Gould art is in very low res, while it can be found in high res here:[2] Seems you dramatically shrunk it when you cropped it? You could also give its date in the caption. FunkMonk (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for review. Not sure how I did that, but large version uploaded now, date added Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

, amen

Coord note

Have we had a source review? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a look now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig's copyvio tool clear Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ref formatting consistent. author names, dates, titles in sentence case etc. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FN 15,16,17,18 and 19 all used once - material faithful to source. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FN 14 used once - my take on the source is that the Canadian occurrences are also in September (so autumn) as much as winter...? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cas, thanks for review. I've added autumn (and removed an extraneous full stop from the ref) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

cool. all good then Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Rose, I don't think there are any outstanding issues at present, image and source reviews have been done, but if there is something I've missed please note that I'm going away for three days and I'll address any further points when I return. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Take plenty of bird photos :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, yeah we probably could've promoted before now but I prefer to leave noms open a few weeks -- I expect I or one of the other coords will close on our next walk through the list unless someone jumps in with concerns... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 13:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.