User talk:Zzuuzz/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Shirley High School

I really don't know why u "removed" what i posted on that page.. i know the creator as he is ma best m8.. i even attend Shirley High school...

I am entitled to write anything about it i want..—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Munongan (talk • contribs).

As is anyone to remove it. See encyclopaedia. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 21:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Casey Serin

71.237.92.216 deleted several comments from an active discussion on the talk page, and posted a comment suggesting that I'm the one who did it. I looked in the history to see if I accidentally split up a longer comment, but I haven't. The edits involved are #126891204, at 17:08, 29 April 2007, and #126888182, at 16:52, 29 April 2007. Are we allowed to restore the comments? (Feeling like a tattletale...) 209.234.66.97 22:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

If comments are removed without good reason they can (and usually should) be reinstated. Good reason can sometimes include personal attacks, dodgy legal things, and comments which are really off-topic and not part of a conversation. If none of these are involved you would be right to restore the comments. At first sight, I can only see one edit [1] which removed three of your comments. You would be quite entitled to restore it. Having said that, you should be a bit wary of restoring comments which describe another editor's emotional state. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 23:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. I will only restore the comment about not using blog sources. 209.234.66.97 23:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thank you kindly for your help. Good luck with your break too! ;) Whiskey in the Jar 10:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism on my user page

Cheers for reverting the vandalism on my user page - much appreciated! DrFrench 15:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleteing my pages

I can understand deleting the imporper external links but please allow me to post a definition of our company. A description of our company services is hardly advertising. Try reviewing Microsoft or the million other comapny definitions on wikipedia.

Also rather then simply reverting to an old page please take the time to properly edit as I have been adding categoies and other defeiinition links that you are overwriting.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seankenalty (talk • contribs).

Please see the guidelines about this. If your company is notable you should wait for someone else to write the article, as happened with the Microsoft article. The description of ITrac Media was blatant self-promotion - I'll even quote a sentence, "We can help your company maximize the value of this channel. Contact....". -- zzuuzz^(talk) 14:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Your Faster Than Me, So I Gave You A Barnstar Lukecarpenter169 14:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! -- zzuuzz^(talk) 14:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

To Zzuuzz, don't bully others

Zzuuzz, you should not hide yourself as a normal user. If you a manager of this topic, you should let other members know.

Why you always delete others links, but add all your links? But when others follow you to add links, you either delete others, or block others to edit. This is not a moral person who should do this kind of bad things.

Please declare yourself, for example, I'm the person who's in charge of this topic. Please don't use your power to bully others. You should know the reason that others add links is to follow you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Apexpromotion (talk • contribs) 00:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC).

Hello. We are all normal editors. The whole Wikipedia project and community has long been of the opinion that people who are here to sell software should not do so. I do not add links to sell software. In fact I will be very impressed if can find any link that I've added. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 00:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

To Zzuuzz, please enable my account

Zzuuzz, everybody can see that your guys are related to those links articles, even though you are not directly sell software. Please enable my account as soon as possible. Otherwise, I have to ask you and other related editors the following question "In front of the God, can you promise that you are not related to those links you added?" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Apexpromotion (talk • contribs) 00:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC).

Neither I nor any other editor I know is related to any links on Wikipedia. Your account is currently enabled. I have not added any links. The last link I added was probably to a government site to reference a school article. Links which are added to promote a product or service are removed - this is an encyclopaedia and not a link directory or a tool to promote sales. Please accept that. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 01:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

It's still diabled when I go to the page http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Internet_marketing , I can't edit it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Apexpromotion (talk • contribs).

The page is currently semi-protected, strangely enough, to deal with the continual spam it gets. I hope you weren't going to try and add your links again. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 01:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandal revert on talk page

Thanks GDonato (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Purgatory Fubar ^Converse or Snafu has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

For reverting vandalism on my userpage. Purgatory Fubar ^Converse or Snafu 22:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I see I have a fan

Must be the weekend. They're at it again! And I guess I should be flattered? [2] Flyguy649^talk_contribs 23:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, just a bit short of the real thing though :) -- zzuuzz^(talk) 23:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Bad Usernames

Is there a template to ask users to change their username without saying you are blocked because I am not an admin. Please respond on my talkpage. WikiMan53 talk / sign? 14:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I think there's a few listed at WP:U. {{UsernameConcern}} is popular, and I quite like {{Username-Warn}}. more here. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 14:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Essay mill article spam

Hi Zzuuzz, the persistent essay folks you blocked User:69.160.9.83 are back at work on Essay mill article. I don't yet know how to revert or undo changes without deleting later edits, so I didn't change the article...hope that's okay. Flowanda 16:23, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I got the impression that the block made an impression, and the later edits didn't seem too bad to me, however feel free to undo their edits if you smell something fishy. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 16:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I removed some of the more "how-to" content, moved some to the talk page and edited the remaining. Happy Zzzzzz! Flowanda 19:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Indef blocks

Sorry, most of the indef blocks were set as a mistake. I generally use the keyboard shortcuts to set the fields. If a key misfires, it causes the block time to be wrongly set. I realize most of the mistakes and tweak them properly but once in a blue moon, some escape through. As for the indef block, I did it temporarily thinking of requesting a checkuser, meanwhile preventing the user from editing. But later decided against it, but forgot to revert the block. Thanks for pointing out. --soum (0_o) 20:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

MDS America merge

Hello. In a follow-up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MDS International (2nd nomination), a merge of the article MDS America into MVDDS dispute has been proposed. You can voice your opinion, if any, on the matter at talk:MVDDS dispute#Straw poll on merging MDS America. Thanks, nadav 21:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

User report

Thank you for your declaration that it is a content dispute between Ccson and myself. Conversation is moved to where it belonged in the first place. Justinm1978 03:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for help with user page

Thanks for semi-protecting my user page from ongoing shenanigans. Mike Dillon 04:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem, the same notice about unprotection applies. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 15:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

{{Username-Warning}}

How do you get Username-Warning to work. I tried it and it came out like this. Wikiman53 t a 12:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

It seems you pressed the wrong button? -- zzuuzz^(talk) 15:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Big Fat Womble Face

Hey there. I've done an WP:RPP on this page due to the user continuously editing their talk page after their ban. :) Are you allowed to protect this page, or are you not allowed because an attack was against you? :) Chrisch 15:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, perhaps have a CheckUser done and block the IP for some time as a result of this threat Chrisch 15:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

If they continue with the abuse there's a pretty clear case for protection - there probably is already. I think we'll see if they cause any problems in the future before CU. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 15:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

thank you

For protecting my user page. I do not know what I have done to offend this guy, other than be Sicilian. The first time he vandalized my page he added "Ma tu, che cazzo c'entri con l'Italia? Non eri neoborbonico?" Which translates roughly to "but you, what the fuck do you have to do with the rest of Italy? Aren't you a Sicilian?"--Ioshus^(talk) 15:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem, they should be deterred for quite a while. I've also watchlisted your talk page in case, let me know if I can help in the future. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 15:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, again. I appreciate it.--Ioshus^(talk) 15:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		for beating me to the rollback button twice. Wow, you are fast... Esperanza Ortega 16:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! -- zzuuzz^(talk) 16:59, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

And...

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage! Invisible Noise 21:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! -- zzuuzz^(talk) 21:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Pete Price

I have reinstated the Phrases, Quotes and Trademarks section to this article. There are no written sources for the content therein, due to the quotes and phrases being transmitted through the medium of radio rather than the written word. Some of the content is found in the Best of the Cranks and Pranks compilations on the Radio City website. Regular listeners to the show will be familar with the content of the section.Mr Lazarescu 15:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC) Mr Lazarescu.

I have commented on the talk page. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 15:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Why are you doing this?

Mr. Zzuuzz, why are you doing this? What's wrong in my category? Why you want to delete it? Why have you declined the editprotected of Paul Wight. Please tell me. Why? Why users don't have any right to create any article, edit any article or make any category in Wikipedia? Why? If Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, so why you people do like this? Asad Entertainment 21:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC) Asad Entertainment.

Vandalism Warning?

Why have you given me a vandalism warning for an article I have never read about a man I have never heard of, when I have never vandalised Wikipedia? Born Acorn 17:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello. If you check the page history you'll see it wasn't me. It was introduced here. I have no idea why - it doesn't even appear to be a vandal. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 17:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh hang on, it was a vandal [3]. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 17:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah, sorry for the alarm, I was just bit worried. Born Acorn 17:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Pictures

Hi, I took most of the images myself, with my own camera for harlequins and for Wikipedia on seperate occaisions and in come cases both. What do i do with these? and took some for methody of the boathouse etc they are mine to realease. ?--Cka4004 22:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Right, well I think it is rediculous that i have to provide evidence of the time i took to go and take photos for Wikipedia. I dont want the article to go down hill. And am not familiar with the licencing process. --88.111.152.33 10:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Public Key

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0
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=tNgr
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

-- Avi 20:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I've violated your user and PGP key pages, I'm afraid ;) . Tell me if you approve, please. -- Avi 21:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

no

This isnt my personal opinion , it is the opinions shared by parents and students of the school. So I am reverting it back. --RedTreddersCompainion 17:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I am a realiable source. I go to this school. There is noone else more realiable then me. --RedTreddersCompainion 17:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

You claim you know so much about the school when you doesnt even go there yourself. I go to the bloody school. I know more about it then you, so stop bullying me and reverting my edits. I am a STUDENT of the school I WOULD KNOW BETTER!. --RedTreddersCompainion 17:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind, I applied a short block to this user. The Rambling Man 17:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, that is fine with me. Hopefully they will take the time to read up on policy, but I somehow doubt it. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. Happy editing... The Rambling Man 18:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Good job!

Just wanted to commend you on your great job reverting vandalism on Torrisholme and related articles. If only some people would find better things to do... Pax:Vobiscum 23:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Dark hero

hes at home right now and im in college but il tell him to stop Tomorrow and get him to Apologise but hes not my freind any more because we had a fight that might be why he did it ♥Eternal Pink-Ready to fight for love and grace♥ 16:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Please Help

The press office staff member from consumer credit counselling service keeps removing information that is relevant but that they don't want people to know. I raised these points and asked them to comment if the information was false in talk but after 2 days, no response. Yet when the information is put back in it is removed by them in minutes. It appears the CCCS press office has hijacked wikipedia for only the informaiton they want people to know. Comehither 15:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Someone who creates the account User:Insidecccs and works on no other topics will find I am universally cynical. Please link to any sources and make sure they are reliable, independent, and relevant. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Oregon City High School

Hey, I noticed you made a couple of helpful edits to Oregon City High School. On that page I've been having a conflict with 128.193.241.186 who is adamant about keeping the page the way he wants it, to the point of vandalism. I don't want it to escalate any further than it already has. Do you have any ideas (such as semi-protecting the page, or an official vandalism warning, etc)? I appreciate the help. Don't worry about responding too fast, though sometime in the next couple of days would be preferred. Comrade^4·2 08:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

I noticed the request at RFPP which I also would have declined. I think it's important to recognise that we are not dealing with vandals here. A little misguided and not familiar with our policies and guidelines, perhaps. Such editors should be dealt with through AGF and consensus and education. There are school articles in a wide variety of conditions on Wikipedia. It's important to allow a little leeway as the article wanders the long path to featured quality. Let me know if I can help further, but with the current editors it probably won't involve protections or blocks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

24.85.53.150

I was about the remove 24.85.53.150 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) from AIV without blocking, as its only made one edit, yesterday, since last block expired. Looking at nature of edits I'm not totally sure it's the same person, so I think some sort of warning before next block should have been given. The nature of the vandalism doesn't seem to warrant a month block either. Could you please re-consider your block; or if there is something else I'm not taking into account, please explain. Thanks, Petros471 13:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm fairly sure it's the same vandal who was blocked twice in the last month for penis vandalism and that no good edits will come from this IP in a month. However I'm not going to be able to persuade you with hard evidence, and it was a bit long, so I'll reduce it to a week. If you think it should be unblocked entirely or for a shorter time, I encourage you to set the block yourself. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok, reduced to a week. Cheers, Petros471 14:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

AccuFund

I just noticed that the contributions I provided in the non-profit accounting software area with regard to AccuFund and the comparison of accounting software has been deleted. I understand and approve the need to ban advertising. This, however is an area under-discussed and all to often lumped into commercial accounting area. This area tends to be serviced by smaller companies and regularly reviewed (references were provided on deleted pages). I would like to have the deletion re-evaluated. What is the process? GordonHolfelder 02:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, the process for undeletion is Deletion review, and the original discussion, for reference, is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccuFund. It will be important to review the conflict of interest guidelines, the notability guidelines, and to provide independent reliable references, ie not press releases, which did not seem to appear before. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 02:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Do you have a warning bell?

Graham Heavy et al only just stared their latest round. I reverted one, and reported to AIV and you had the sock already blocked!! I imagine a flashing red light onto of your computer that goes off with accompanying bells whenever one of the sockpuppeteers you watch becomes active again! Good stuff! Cheers, Flyguy649^talk_contribs 17:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Something like that ;) There are so few other people who edit Bare Lane railway station that when someone does it tends to stick out. He should go and edit George Bush or something, then I'd never notice. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

And when you have changes to Bare Lane railway station, and Morecambe, and Torrisholme at the same time... it does rather stick out. Have a good day! Flyguy649^talk_contribs 17:30, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

MDS case

The case was brought to AN/I. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 12:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Freddie Peacock

Can I ask why you removed the protection from the page? GMc 20:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Protection can only be applied by admins, usually at WP:RFPP. I merely removed the template. The protection status remains unchanged. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Spotlight Radio

The Spotlight Radio is Internet Radio therefore I feel has a place here. I saw a list of internet radio stations under the Internet Radio subject and so it seemed appropriate that it be here. However, if I have added content that is inappropriate I can understand that. Please advise. I hope I added this correctly.

Please review the guidelines at WP:WEB, in particular the need for independent reliable coverage of the subject. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for supporting my RfA, which closed successfully a couple of days a ago. I was busy the last couple of days, but I do really appreciate your support. Happy editing, Signature^brendel 05:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Have yo got a kutas?

Embechens 18:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Will you be explaining the relevance of this question? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Re-block?

I think you blocked this User talk:213.2.197.213 who has been reinstated and is up to his (possibly her) old tricks again. I wondered if you could work your magic again and reblock him. Thanks SuzanneKn 19:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Codysucks.com

what's up zzz, thanks for deleting what i wrote, you know it's real nice to know someone is not minding their own bussiness —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hslhfuh (talk • contribs). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

replied on your talk page. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

A good example

You are kind to make those changes to the school's article. You set a good example. iames 22:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

To a rash greenhorn like me in particular, I mean. iames 22:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Lol. It pays to help the noobs, because they can help write a better encyclopaedia :) Often the best way to deal with a problem article is to improve it. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:DENY

Maybe we should apply this to Mr Heavy et al? I believe you're doing this to the latest batch of hosiery. Revert only, yes? Cheers, Flyguy649^talk_contribs 00:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I guess. It's not really a deliberate thing, though it probably should be. He does seem to like his usernames IYKWIM. We have been through a checkuser, and all the accounts are obvious and indef-blocked, so the category is not as useful as in other cases. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

IKWYM. -- Flyguy649^talk_contribs 01:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

HELLO!!!

Hi there!! my article on the Ivory League is refering to term only used in speeches at the Heamster's and missterress' conferances. The members are introduced to each other as either Ivory or Plain at these conferances. So please dont delete it...its real!! P.S. Your fast! xxxxx :)

There really needs to be sources for both the existence of this list, and inclusion in it. See the policy on verifiability. We have a hard enough job finding references for the Rugby Group and Haileybury Group without adding yet another group which is only mentioned in occasional speeches and nowhere else (and doesn't really contain anything new either). Sources, please. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

B1 ... B4

Now you've got me curious too. I have no idea what that means. The relevant standard would be the 6th bullet of criterion 5, I guess, so I don't know where B1/B4 comes from. --BigDT 01:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

It seems to be a version of TWINKLE [4]. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 01:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user talk page. :-) Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 17:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem. It looked like a compromised account since it hadn't edited for 9 months. Friend of yours? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks for removing vandalism from my page ^_^ ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 18:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem! -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I came here to thank you for dealing with the vandalism to my archive page — from the other messages here, it looks as though you have a vocation, and deserve more than just a quick "thank you" — so:

		The Special Barnstar
		For defending other editors against malice and petulance. Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:14, 26 May 2

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks for the welcome, it made me jump when I saw the pink box, I thought I had done something wrong. I have been reading Wikipedia for a month or so, and watching and reading the guidelines, I hope, in my own small way, to be a positive contributor and your welcome helped me feel, for want of a better word, included in this massive project. Again thank you. --BotleyBoy 14:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 007 (UTC)

Neville Teller

I've deleted this as being a copyright violation, feel free to re-write though. —— Eagle101^{Need help?} 09:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Eagle101, it took longer to deal with than I expected. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

help

the User:220.237.107.166 has denied access to the Serbia article. I'm asking u to remove the ban since the blockade is quite inappropriate and the user has a list of intolerant behavior towards these articles. Best, User:NeroN_BG

It's fixed now. He made that edit seconds before I blocked him, so I didn't notice it. In future you can fix it yourself - see Help:Reverting. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thnx, appreciate it. x User:NeroN_BG

reposts

About reposts - see my post here - so either 1) the criteria has changed since the tag was created? 2) the tag is wrong? 3) it is allowed and the misunderstanding is that the DB-repost cannot be used for speedy when it actually can if the content is the same? --Fredrick day 19:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

It's long been explicitly mentioned in the CSD policy. The reason that reposts aren't automatically eligible is because they are usually eligible for the original reason they were speedy deleted. They are usually eligible, but not for being reposted. This is also mentioned in the CSD. I think the template says to check the deletion log for previous non-speedy deletions, but it's not really very clear. The CSD policy is the more correct. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for all the vandalism reverts on my talkpage, I really appreciate it. --Caltas^(talk) 11:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your advice. As you suggested I added a request on the Iraq Talk Page to add Iraq Image to the external links. I believe Iraq Image website is pertinent to the information displayed, and will help any researcher. Thanks again. jarmo99^(talk) 15:30, 28 May 2007 (EST)

Sophie EB

I've move protected the article, if the editor does a cut'n'paste botch job on another article I think it's a block... /wangi 09:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think move protection will help a cut and paste move? I've already applied a short block. It's probably a vandal. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Duh, you're of course right! I'll unprotect that. Thanks/wangi 09:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

For the reverts of my user and talk pages - annoyingly, a phone call came just as I was dealing with the idiot! Much appreciated Stephenb (Talk) 11:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I had a similar issue, conveniently a few seconds later. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Question

Jak możesz twierdzić, że istnieje coś takiego jak homofobia? Przecież homofobia to wymysł pedałów. A może ty jesteś pedałem?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Embechens (talk • contribs).

^_^

♥Fighting for charming Love♥ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 20:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Eternal. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

ya mum

ya mum! was started by ben farley so it is therefore not vandalism. I do not mean to appear to be rude or vadalising.. but how is me putting the real facts on a page "vandalising"? pray tell —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ArnieBabe (talk • contribs).

Where is the source of this information, and who is ben farley? Who is Callum Bush? Are they from KSHS? Please stop vandalising. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Message

Sorry for the copy-pasting. Not that I really understand it here. But I like it here, should be good fun... --Belazzur 12:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

It was A_S_T,I swear.

I did add the bit about Rushup Edge leaks though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.22.148.33 (talk • contribs).

Thanks

Gracias. For protecting me talk page. (edit) and I mean reverting.... IvoShandor 10:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem! -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Cheers.....

........for reverting vandalism on my talk page! Pedro |  Chat  10:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem! -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Wasn't me

I have a shared IP address
so, my brother did "vandalism" and then
I was banned.
unfair...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.145.169.167 (talk • contribs).

Please try and dissuade your brother from vandalism, or your editing ability will be affected as an unfortunate consequence. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

your comments

I didn't and please remember: Wikipedia:Assume good faith PianoKeys 22:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

There is no evidence of these images being licensed under the GFDL, indeed all evidence is to the contrary. Is there a source for the licence claim? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for removng vandalism from my page and from blocking him/her ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 23:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)