Wikipedia talk:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia

This page was nominated for deletion on 9 May 2015. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia

Skepticism

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism

Lists

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList

Counter-Vandalism Unit

This page is within the scope of the Counter-Vandalism Unit, a WikiProject dedicated to combating vandalism on Wikipedia. You can help the CVU by watching the recent changes and undoing unconstructive edits. For more information go to the CVU's home page or see cleaning up vandalism.Counter-Vandalism UnitWikipedia:Counter-Vandalism UnitTemplate:Counter-Vandalism UnitCounter-Vandalism Unit

This page has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Adam Coomer (2013-05-13). "Should university students use Wikipedia?". The Guardian. Retrieved 2013-05-15.
Omer Benjakob (2019-10-04). "The Fake Nazi Death Camp: Wikipedia's Longest Hoax, Exposed". Haaretz. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
Pride David (February 1, 2023). "Wikipedia: the good, the bad and the ugly". Poynter Institute. Retrieved 2023-02-02.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 8 sections are present.

Battle of Madarpur

Battle of Madarpur was created in October 2014, currently at PROD. Doesn't seem to exist, as the only cited source doesn't mention it at all, and I can't find any sources before 2014 that mention it -- just Wikipedia mirrors and the like. @Piotrus: what say you? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer Single GBooks hit of dubious reliability ([1]). Madarpur redirects to Munger district, but this term is not even mentioned there (RfD?). Our infobox gives location as Kanpur, not Madarpur. Cited reference, as the link shows, is not for Madarpur but for kanyakubja (redirects to Kannauj). Creator is a WP:SPA Golanducal (talk · contribs). The article has a longer list of references (badly formatted) at one point [2], mostly half legible/gibberish (ex. "Swami sahajanand rachanavali" - what is this? Does not google). There was one EL to [3], which is still live, and which does mention the word Madarpur (in machine translation). Overall, I'd classify this as Type 3 (Possible hoax but with room for doubt) or (given the online source using this term) as Type 4 (False or unreferenced and dubious statement that may or may not be a hoax as it could arguably have been added as a mistake or in good faith) - this could be a bad translation / transliteration of something from Hindu or some other Indian language. It is a badly written, confusing article, too poorly sourced to meet our policies, but I would not call it an outright hoax for the reasons given above - it is just so badly written it is one of those cases it is hard to dinstinguish a hoax (invented story) from a badly written mess. We can add it to the list here as Type 3, why not - we already have many Type 3 and such entries here already, people call a lot of stuff hoaxes even if it is not necessarily one, and list it here (and I do think a list of Wikipedia errors is a good to have, just don't call them hoaxes, folks - most are not). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was rumpology a hoax?

I am leaning no, but if folks care: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumpology. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El castillo de los monstruos (1964 film)

This 17-year old article is about to be deleted as a hoax: El castillo de los monstruos (1964 film) (see talk page for discussion). Created as a redirect 7 March 2007, as an article 30 June 2009. Fram (talk) 18:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From the discussion it seems to be some kind of a database error or unintentional confusion rather than a hoax. Gawaon (talk) 07:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More like an IMDb hoax which got copied to here. Fram (talk) 07:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amberlihisar fortress in Turkey, other AI-generated articles in 404 Media article

https://www.404media.co/email/d516cf7f-3b5f-4bf4-93da-325d9522dd79/?ref=daily-stories-newsletter

Seems like the hoaxes mentioned in the article should be on the list. Seananony (talk) 00:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. How can this not be on the list:

Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Amberlihisar? Seananony (talk) 00:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This list is incomplete and you are likely to update it, but keep in mind not all errors are hoaxes. Also, you did not link to any discussion that explains why this is a hoax. @Scott who may offer more insight. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heya! It was speedy deleted as G3 (blatant hoax) by GeneralNotability without any discussion that I saw. I honestly don't know why it's been described as "AI-generated", by the way (hence its appearance in that article which is doing the rounds on social media at the moment). Is the idea here that a hoaxer would be too lazy to write all that and make up the references? Because after seeing plenty of detailed and well-structured hoaxes over the years, I would never make that assumption. — Scott • talk 12:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Scott I added Amberlihisar. Hopefully I did it right. Seananony (talk) 05:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kamini Yacht Club

Kamini Yacht Club looks like a qualified candidate for a spot among Extant for 10+ years, and has been brought to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamini Yacht Club. Sam Sailor 10:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Braeden and the sinking of the MV Wilhelm Gustloff

Talk:Eric Braeden#Wilhelm Gustloff may qualify. Extant from 27 June 2018[4] till 4 November 2024.[5] The false claim that Braeden was a survivor of the disaster, added by an unregistered user 6 years ago, is spreading on social media since at least 2022, and has even made it into a number of books, and on other Wikipedias. Renerpho (talk) 04:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North East Mail

Created in 2012, North East Mail appears to be a hoax. Current prod tag says no results for it come up, and the alleged website never hosted any info about the publication. Is this one a hoax? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a hoax: there's an X profile, and the newspaper is listed on page 131 of this PDF of registered newspapers from the Registrar of Newspapers. The PDF also lists the owner of the newspaper, who appears to be a real person. Malerisch (talk) 10:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glamoč airport

This is not a hoax. See http://sr.wiki.x.io/sr-el/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0_%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B5_%D0%9B%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5_%D0%A0%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0_1943. or https://znaci.org/odrednica.php?slug=glamoc or many other sources in local languages including pictures (for instance https://www.mycity-military.com/Drugi-svetski-rat/Dornier-Do-17.html). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.76.226.79 (talk) 13:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]